Incomplete letter recognition is limited by cortical and not optical factors: Simulating the visual deficits of dementia in healthy adults

Abstract

Incomplete letter recognition tasks are frequently used to detect visual deficits arising from neurodegenerative syndromes, including Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA; visual-variant Alzheimers disease). A recent development of this approach is the Graded Incomplete Letters Test (GILT), which measures recognition thresholds for letters degraded by removing pixelated sections (decreasing completeness). Although GILT thresholds are strongly elevated in PCA relative to typical adults, the precise cortical visual impairments underlying these deficits are unclear, as is the potential contribution from age-related optical limitations. We compared candidate cortical factors (crowding and global integration) with optical limitations (blur and low contrast) by simulating these factors in typical adults (n=6) viewing incomplete letter stimuli. Participants identified foveally presented letters (12 alternatives), with completeness varied using QUEST. At baseline, thresholds averaged [~]5% completeness. Optical factors were simulated by separately applying blur and lowered contrast. These factors had minimal effect on thresholds, except where blur/contrast levels approached visibility limits, where thresholds rose modestly but remained far below clinical levels in PCA. Cortical factors were simulated by increasing crowding (disruptions from clutter) through peripheral presentation, with global-integration impairments simulated by varying pixel size to alter the distribution of degradation (limiting spatial integration) or degrading letters dynamically with limited-lifetime pixels (limiting temporal integration). These manipulations substantially elevated thresholds, with combined crowding and global-integration impairments increasing thresholds to levels comparable with PCA. We conclude that impaired incomplete letter recognition is driven primarily by cortical rather than optical factors, and that neurodegenerative deficits may reflect the combined impact of multiple cortical limitations.