Attention cueing in rivalry: insights from pupillometry
Abstract
We used pupillometry to evaluate the effects of attention cueing on perceptual bi-stability, as reported by adult human observers. Perceptual alternations and pupil diameter were measured during two forms of rivalry, generated by presenting a white and a black disk to the two eyes (binocular rivalry) or splitting the disks between eyes (interocular grouping rivalry). In line with previous studies, we found that subtle pupil size oscillations (about 0.05 mm) tracked alternations between exclusive dominance phases of the black or white disk. These oscillations were larger for perceptually stronger stimuli: presented to the dominant eye or with physically higher luminance contrast. However, cueing of endogenous attention to one of the rivaling percepts did not affect pupil oscillations during exclusive dominance phases. This was in spite of the reliable effects of endogenous attention on perceptual dominance, which shifted in favor of the cued percept by about 10%. The results were comparable for binocular and interocular grouping rivalry. Cueing only had a marginal modulatory effect on pupil size during mixed percepts in binocular rivalry. This may suggest that, rather than acting by modulating perceptual strength, endogenous attention primarily acts during periods of unresolved competition, which is compatible with attention being automatically directed to the rivaling stimuli during periods of exclusive dominance and thereby sustaining perceptual alternations. Significance StatementBinocular rivalry depends on attention. When it is diverted away from the stimuli, perceptual alternations slow down; when it is preferentially directed to one stimulus, perception lingers more on it, consistent with attention enhancing the effective strength of the rivaling stimuli. Here we introduce pupillometry as a means to indirectly track changes in effective stimulus strength. We find that pupil size oscillates, accurately tracking perceived luminance during two forms of rivalry: binocular rivalry and interocular grouping rivalry. Both show robust effects of attention cueing on perceptual dominance, but pupil oscillations during exclusive dominance are unaffected by cueing. This suggests that endogenous attention does not affect perceptual strength during exclusive dominance, though it might do so during transition phases.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Field percentile
- top 28%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pupil size reflects the content of covertly attended afterimages
Ana Vilotijević, Sebastiaan Mathôt·bioRxiv·May 7, 2026
- Attention induced perceptual traveling waves in binocular rivalry
João V.X. Cardoso, Hsin-Hung Li, … Laura Dugué·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2025
- Aperiodic pupil fluctuations at rest predict orienting of visual attention
Rongwei Wang, Jianrong Jia·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Emphasis on peripheral vision is accompanied by pupil dilation
Ana Vilotijević, Sebastiaan Mathôt·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2023
- Separable pupillary signatures of perception and action during perceptual multistability
Jan W. Brascamp, Gilles de Hollander, … Tomas H. J. Knapen·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2021
- Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry
Matthew Davidson, David Alais, … Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2018