Journal of CheminformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Exploring The Ability Of Machine Learning-Based Virtual Screening Models To Identify The Functional Groups Responsible For Binding
Thomas E. HadfieldiD, Jack ScantleburyiD, Charlotte Mary DeaneiD
Abstract
Many recently proposed structure-based virtual screening models appear to be able to accurately distinguish high affinity binders from non-binders. However, several recent studies have shown that they often do so by exploiting ligand-specific biases in the dataset, rather than identifying favourable intermolecular interactions in the input protein-ligand complex. In this work we propose a novel approach for assessing the extent to which machine learningbased virtual screening models are able to identify the functional groups responsible for binding. To sidestep the difficulty in establishing the ground truth importance of each atom of a large scale set of protein-ligand complexes, we propose a protocol for generating synthetic data where the label of an example is assigned by a 3-dimensional deterministic binding rule. This allows us to precisely quantify the ground truth importance of each atom and compare it to the model generated attributions. Using our generated datasets, we demonstrate that a recently proposed deep learning-based virtual screening model, PointVS, identified the most important functional groups with 39% more efficiency than a fingerprint-based random forest, suggesting that it would generalise more effectively to new examples. In addition, we found that ligand-specific biases, such as those present in widely used virtual screening datasets, substantially impaired the ability of all ML models to identify the most important functional groups. We have made our synthetic data generation framework available to facilitate the benchmarking of new virtual screening models. Code is available at https://github.com/tomhadfield95/synthVS.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Step Towards Generalisability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening
Jack Scantlebury, Lucy Vost, … Charlotte Mary Deane·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2022
- Convex-PLR - Revisiting affinity predictions and virtual screening using physics-informed machine learning
Maria Kadukova, Vladimir Chupin, Sergei Grudinin·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2021
- Dataset Augmentation Allows Deep Learning-Based Virtual Screening To Better Generalize To Unseen Target Classes, And Highlight Important Binding Interactions
Jack Scantlebury, Nathan Brown, … Charlotte Mary Deane·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2020
- vScreenML v2.0: Improved Machine Learning Classification for Reducing False Positives in Structure-Based Virtual Screening
Grigorii V. Andrianov, Emeline Haroldsen, John Karanicolas·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2024
- The impact of compound library size on the performance of scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening
Louison Fresnais, Pedro J. Ballester·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2020
- Learning Binding Affinities via Fine-tuning of Protein and Ligand Language Models
Rohan Gorantla, Aryo Pradipta Gema, … Antonia S. J. S. Mey·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025