bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
A Step Towards Generalisability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening
Jack ScantleburyiD, Lucy VostiD, Anna CarberyiD, Thomas E. HadfieldiD, Oliver M. TurnbulliD, Nathan BrowniD, Vijil ChenthamarakshaniD, Payel DasiD, Harold GrosjeaniD, F. von DelftiD, Charlotte Mary DeaneiD
Abstract
Over the last few years, many machine learning-based scoring functions for predicting the binding of small molecules to proteins have been developed. Their objective is to approximate the distribution which takes two molecules as input and outputs the energy of their interaction. Only a scoring function that accounts for the interatomic interactions involved in binding can accurately predict binding affinity on unseen molecules. However, many scoring functions make predictions based on dataset biases rather than an understanding of the physics of binding. These scoring functions perform well when tested on similar targets to those in the training set, but fail to generalise to dissimilar targets. To test what a machine learning-based scoring function has learnt, input attribution--a technique for learning which features are important to a model when making a prediction on a particular data point--can be applied. If a model successfully learns something beyond dataset biases, attribution should give insight into the important binding interactions that are taking place. We built a machine learning-based scoring function that aimed to avoid the influence of bias via thorough train and test dataset filtering, and show that it achieves comparable performance on the CASF-2016 benchmark to other leading methods. We then use the CASF-2016 test set to perform attribution, and find that the bonds identified as important by PointVS, unlike those extracted from other scoring functions, have a high correlation with those found by a distance-based interaction profiler. We then show that attribution can be used to extract important binding pharmacophores from a given protein target when supplied with a number of bound structures. We use this information to perform fragment elaboration, and see improvements in docking scores compared to using structural information from a traditional, data-based approach. This not only provides definitive proof that the scoring function has learnt to identify some important binding interactions, but also constitutes the first deep learning-based method for extracting structural information from a target for molecule design.
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploring The Ability Of Machine Learning-Based Virtual Screening Models To Identify The Functional Groups Responsible For Binding
Thomas E. Hadfield, Jack Scantlebury, Charlotte Mary Deane·Journal of CheminformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2023
- Convex-PLR - Revisiting affinity predictions and virtual screening using physics-informed machine learning
Maria Kadukova, Vladimir Chupin, Sergei Grudinin·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2021
- Learning Binding Affinities via Fine-tuning of Protein and Ligand Language Models
Rohan Gorantla, Aryo Pradipta Gema, … Antonia S. J. S. Mey·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- How Bias Shapes the Leaderboard: Scoring Function Performance Under Scrutiny
David Graber, Jakub Kopko, … Siddhartha Mishra·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2026
- iScore: A ML-Based Scoring Function for de novo Drug Discovery
Sayyed Jalil Mahdizadeh, Leif Axel Eriksson·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2024
- DyScore: A Boosting Scoring Method with Dynamic Properties for Identifying True Binders and Non-binders in Structure-based Drug Discovery
Yanjun Li, Daohong Zhou, … Yaxia Yuan·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2022