Automating ACMG Variant Classifications Using BIAS-2015: An Algorithm Overview and Benchmark Against the FDA-Approved eRepo Dataset
Christopher Edward EisenhartiD, Joel MewtoniD, Rachel BrickeyiD, Vafa BayatiD
Abstract
In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) in collaboration with the Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP) published guidelines for the interpretation and classification of germline genomic variants. The ACMG terminology guidelines outlined criteria for assigning one of five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain significance, likely pathogenic and pathogenic. While the paper laid out 28 different classifiers and the justification for them, it did not provide specific algorithms for implementing these classifiers in an automated manner. Here we present the Bitscopic Interpreting ACMG Standards 2015 (BIAS-2015) software as a complete, open-source algorithm which categorizes variants according to the ACMG classification system. BIAS-2015 evaluates 18 of the 28 ACMG criteria to classify variants in an automated and consistent way while recording the rationale for each classifier to enable in-depth review. We used the genomic data from the ClinGen Evidence Repository (eRepo v1.0.29), one of two FDA-recognized human genetic variant databases, to evaluate the performance of the BIAS-2015 algorithm. All code for BIAS-2015 has been made available on GitHub.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automating ACMG Variant Classifications With BIAS-2015 v2.0.0: Algorithm Analysis and Benchmark Against the FDA-Approved eRepo Dataset
Christopher Edward Eisenhart, Rachel Brickey, … Vafa Bayat·medRxiv·Feb 23, 2025
- Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines
Rajarshi Ghosh, Ninad Oak, Sharon E. Plon·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2017
- Calibration and refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria for variant classification with BayesQuantify
Sihan Liu, Xiaoshu Feng, … Fengxiao Bu·Journal of Medical GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2025
- ClinGen Variant Curation Interface: A Variant Classification Platform for the Application of Evidence Criteria from ACMG/AMP Guidelines
Christine G. Preston, Matt W. Wright, … Helio A. Costa·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2022
- Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel
Michael T. Parsons, Miguel de la Hoya, … Amanda B. Spurdle·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2024
- AutoGVP: a dockerized workflow integrating ClinVar and InterVar germline sequence variant classification
Jung Kim, Ammar S. Naqvi, … Sharon J. Diskin·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2024