Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch
Abstract
To discern speech or appreciate music, the human auditory system detects how pitch increases or decreases over time. However, the algorithms used to detect changes in pitch, or pitch motion, are incompletely understood. Here, using psychophysics, computational modeling, functional neuroimaging, and analysis of recorded speech, we ask if humans can detect pitch motion using computations analogous to those used by the visual system. We adapted stimuli from studies of vision to create novel auditory correlated noise stimuli that elicited robust pitch motion percepts. Crucially, these stimuli are inharmonic and possess no persistent features across frequency or time, but do possess positive or negative local spectrotemporal correlations in intensity. In psychophysical experiments, we found clear evidence that humans can judge pitch direction based only on positive or negative spectrotemporal intensity correlations. The key behavioral result--robust sensitivity to the negative spectrotemporal correlations--is a direct analogue of illusory "reverse-phi" motion in vision, and thus constitutes a new auditory illusion. Our behavioral results and computational modeling led us to hypothesize that human auditory processing may employ pitch direction opponency. fMRI measurements in auditory cortex supported this hypothesis. To link our psychophysical findings to real-world pitch perception, we analyzed recordings of English and Mandarin speech and found that pitch direction was robustly signaled by both positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations, suggesting that sensitivity to both types of correlations confers ecological benefits. Overall, this work reveals how motion detection algorithms sensitive to local correlations are deployed by the central nervous system across disparate modalities (vision and audition) and dimensions (space and frequency).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Representation of auditory motion directions and sound source locations in the human planum temporale
Ceren Battal, Mohamed Rezk, … Olivier Collignon·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2019
- Automatic Change Detection of Human Attractiveness: Comparing Visual and Auditory Perception
Meng Liu, Jin Gao, … Weijun Li·Brain SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2025
- Auditory efferents facilitate intensity change detection in humans: evidence from concurrent ear, brain, and behavior measures
Yuan He, Miranda Adamczak, … Sriram Boothalingam·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2025
- Cortical substrates of perceptual confusion between pitch and timbre
Yongtian Ou, Emily Allen, … Andrew J. Oxenham·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2025
- Dynamics of pitch perception in the auditory cortex
Ellie Bean Abrams, Alec Marantz, … Laura Gwilliams·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2025
- Conscious and unconscious perception of pitch shifts in auditory feedback during vocalization: Behavioral functions and event-related potential correlates
Daniel Suchý, Roozbeh Behroozmand, Henry Railo·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 13, 2025