bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
A Gold Standard for Transcription Factor Regulatory Interactions in Escherichia coli K-12: Architecture of Evidence Types
Paloma LaraiD, Socorro Gama‐CastroiD, Heladia SalgadoiD, Claire RioualeniD, Víctor H. TierrafríaiD, Luis Muñiz-RascadoiD, César Bonavides-MartíneziD, Julio Collado‐VidesiD
Abstract
Post-genomic implementations have expanded the experimental strategies to identify elements involved in the regulation of transcription initiation. As new methodologies emerge, a natural step is to compare their results with those from established methodologies, such as the classic methods of molecular biology used to characterize transcription factor binding sites, promoters, or transcription units. In the case of Escherichia coli K-12, the best-studied microorganism, for the last 30 years we have continuously gathered such knowledge from original scientific publications, and have organized it in two databases, RegulonDB and EcoCyc. Furthermore, since RegulonDB version 11.0 (1), we offer comprehensive datasets of binding sites from chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with sequencing (ChIP-seq), ChIP combined with exonuclease digestion and next-generation sequencing (ChIP-exo), genomic SELEX screening (gSELEX), and DNA affinity purification sequencing (DAP-seq) HT technologies, as well as additional datasets for transcription start sites, transcription units and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) expression profiles. Here, we present for the first time an analysis of the sources of knowledge supporting the collection of transcriptional regulatory interactions (RIs) of E. coli K-12. An RI is formed by the transcription factor, its positive or negative effect on a promoter, a gene or transcription unit. We improved the evidence codes so that the specific methods are described, and we classified them into seven independent groups. This is the basis for our updated computation of confidence levels, weak, strong, or confirmed, for the collection of RIs. We compare the confidence levels of the RI collection before and after adding HT evidence illustrating how knowledge will change as more HT data and methods appear in the future. Users can generate subsets filtering out the method they want to benchmark and avoid circularity, or keep for instance only the confirmed interactions. The comparison of different HT methods with the available datasets indicate that ChIP-seq recovers the highest fraction (>70%) of binding sites present in RegulonDB followed by gSELEX, DAP-seq and ChIP-exo. There is no other genomic database that offers this comprehensive high-quality anatomy of evidence supporting a corpus of transcriptional regulatory interactions.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Towards a unified resource for transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli K-12: Incorporating high throughput-generated binding data within the classic framework of regulation of initiation of transcription in RegulonDB.
Alberto Santos-Zavaleta, Mishael Sánchez-Pérez, … Julio Collado‐Vides·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2018
- Programmatic access to bacterial regulatory networks with regutools
Joselyn Chávez, Carmina Barberena-Jonas, … Alejandro Reyes·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2020
- Unraveling the functions of uncharacterized transcription factors in Escherichia coli using ChIP-exo
Ye Gao, Hyun Gyu Lim, … Bernhard Ørn Palsson·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2021
- UniBind: maps of high-confidence direct TF-DNA interactions across nine species
Rafael Riudavets Puig, Paul Boddie, … Anthony Mathelier·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2021
- Factorbook: an Updated Catalog of Transcription Factor Motifs and Candidate Regulatory Motif Sites
Henry Pratt, Gregory Andrews, … Zhiping Weng·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2021
- RTFBSDB: an integrated framework for transcription factor binding site analysis
Zhong Wang, Andre L Martins, Charles G Danko·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2016