Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Structural and sequential regularities modulate phrase-rate neural tracking
Abstract
Electrophysiological brain activity has been shown to synchronize with the quasi-regular repetition of grammatical phrases in connected speech - so-called phrase-rate neural tracking. Current debate centers around whether this phenomenon is best explained in terms of the syntactic properties of phrases or in terms of syntax-external information, such as the sequential repetition of parts of speech. As these two factors were confounded in previous studies, much of the literature is compatible with both accounts. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to determine if and when the brain is sensitive to both types of information. Twenty native speakers of Mandarin Chinese listened to isochronously presented streams of monosyllabic words, which contained either grammatical two-word phrases (e.g., catch fish, sell house) or non-grammatical word combinations (e.g., full lend, bread far). Within the grammatical conditions, we varied two structural factors: the position of the head of each phrase and the type of attachment. Within the non-grammatical conditions, we varied the consistency with which parts of speech were repeated. Tracking was quantified through evoked power and inter-trial phase coherence, both derived from the frequency-domain representation of EEG responses. As expected, neural tracking at the phrase rate was stronger in grammatical sequences than in non-grammatical sequences without syntactic structure. Moreover, it was modulated by both attachment type and head position, revealing the structure-sensitivity of phrase-rate tracking. We additionally found that the brain tracks the repetition of parts of speech in non-grammatical sequences. These data provide an integrative perspective on the current debate about neural tracking effects, revealing that the brain utilizes regularities computed over multiple levels of linguistic representation in guiding rhythmic computation.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Field percentile
- top 24%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Task-dependent and automatic tracking of hierarchical linguistic structure
Sanne ten Oever, Sara Carta, … Andrea E. Martin·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2022
- Neural encoding of phrases and sentences in spoken language comprehension
Fan Bai, Antje S. Meyer, Andrea E. Martin·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2022
- Grammatical category and the neural processing of phrases.
Amelia Burroughs, Nina Kazanina, Conor J Houghton·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- The frequency dependence of EEG-speech envelope tracking does not reflect the rates of speech units or pitch
Michael P. Thornton, Tobias Reichenbach·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2026
- Speech tracking in auditory and motor regions reflects distinct linguistic features
Anne Keitel, Joachim Groß, Christoph Kayser·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2018
- Neural harmonics of syntactic structure
Alessandro Tavano, Stefan Blohm, … David Poeppel·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2020