Task-dependent and automatic tracking of hierarchical linguistic structure
Sanne ten OeveriD, Sara Carta, Greta KaufeldiD, Andrea E. MartiniD
Abstract
Linguistic phrases are tracked in sentences even though there is no clear acoustic phrasal marker in the physical signal. This phenomenon suggests an automatic tracking of abstract linguistic structure that is endogenously generated by the brain. However, all studies investigating linguistic tracking compare conditions where either relevant information at linguistic timescales is available, or where this information is absent altogether (e.g., sentences versus word lists during passive listening). It is therefore unclear whether tracking at these phrasal timescales is related to the content of language, or rather, is a consequence of attending to the timescales that happen to match behaviourally-relevant information. To investigate this question, we presented participants with sentences and word lists while recording their brain activity with MEG. Participants performed passive, syllable, word, and word-combination tasks corresponding to attending to rates they would naturally attend to, syllable-rates, word-rates, and phrasal-rates, respectively. We replicated overall findings of stronger phrasal-rate tracking measured with mutual information (MI) for sentences compared to word lists across the classical language network. However, in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) we found a task-effect suggesting stronger phrasal-rate tracking during the word-combination task independent of the presence of linguistic structure, as well as stronger delta-band connectivity during this task. These results suggest that extracting linguistic information at phrasal-rates occurs automatically with or without the presence of an additional task, but also that that IFG might be important for temporal integration across various perceptual domains.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 53
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Structural and sequential regularities modulate phrase-rate neural tracking
Junyuan Zhao, Andrea E. Martin, Cas W. Coopmans·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2024
- Low-frequency Cortical Activity Reflects Context-dependent Parsing of Word Sequences
Honghua Chen, Minhui Zhang, … Nai Ding·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 13, 2025
- The influence of auditory attention on rhythmic speech entrainment
Rodika Sokoliuk, Giulio Degano, … Damian Cruse·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2020
- Speech tracking in auditory and motor regions reflects distinct linguistic features
Anne Keitel, Joachim Groß, Christoph Kayser·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2018
- Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy
Greta Kaufeld, Hans Rutger Bosker, … Andrea E. Martin·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2020
- Neural encoding of phrases and sentences in spoken language comprehension
Fan Bai, Antje S. Meyer, Andrea E. Martin·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2022