Effective Degrees of Freedom of the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient under Autocorrelation
Abstract
The dependence between pairs of time series is commonly quantified by Pearsons correlation. However, if the time series are themselves dependent (i.e. exhibit temporal autocorrelation), the effective degrees of freedom (EDF) are reduced, the standard error of the sample correlation coefficient is biased, and Fishers transformation fails to stabilise the variance. Since fMRI time series are notoriously autocorrelated, the issue of biased standard errors - before or after Fishers transformation - becomes vital in individual-level analysis of resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) and must be addressed anytime a standardized Z-score is computed. We find that the severity of autocorrelation is highly dependent on spatial characteristics of brain regions, such as the size of regions of interest and the spatial location of those regions. We further show that the available EDF estimators make restrictive assumptions that are not supported by the data, resulting in biased rsFC inferences that lead to distorted topological descriptions of the connectome on the individual level. We propose a practical \"xDF\" method that accounts not only for distinct autocorrelation in each time series, but instantaneous and lagged cross-correlation. We find the xDF correction varies substantially over node pairs, indicating the limitations of global EDF corrections used previously. In addition to extensive synthetic and real data validations, we investigate the impact of this correction on rsFC measures in data from the Young Adult Human Connectome Project, showing that accounting for autocorrelation dramatically changes fundamental graph theoretical measures relative to no correction.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 169
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sliding window functional connectivity inference with nonstationary autocorrelations and cross-correlations
Jing Zhang, Stefan Posse, Curtis M. Tatsuoka·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2024
- Spatial and temporal autocorrelation weave complexity in brain networks
Maxwell Shinn, Amber Hu, … John D. Murray·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2023
- Evaluating the sensitivity of functional connectivity measures to motion artifact in resting-state fMRI data
Arun S. Mahadevan, Ursula A. Tooley, … Danielle S. Bassett·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2021
- Nuisance Effects and the Limitations of Nuisance Regression in Dynamic Functional Connectivity fMRI
Alican Nalci, Bhaskar D. Rao, Thomas T. Liu·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2018
- The link between steady-state EEG and rs-fMRI metrics in healthy young adults: the effect of macrovascular correction
Xiaole Z. Zhong, Hannah Van Lankveld, … J. Jean Chen·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2025
- Multiscale Detrended Cross-Correlation Coefficient: Estimating Coupling in Nonstationary Neurophysiological Signals
Orestis Stylianou, Gianluca Susi, … Petra Ritter·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2024