Multiscale Detrended Cross-Correlation Coefficient: Estimating Coupling in Nonstationary Neurophysiological Signals
Orestis StylianouiD, Gianluca SusiiD, Martin Hoffmann, Isabel Suárez‐MéndeziD, David López‐SanziD, Michael SchirneriD, Petra RitteriD
Abstract
The brain consists of a vastly interconnected network of regions, the connectome. By estimating the statistical interdependence of neurophysiological time series, we can measure the functional connectivity (FC) of this connectome. Pearsons correlation (rP) is a common metric of coupling in FC studies. Yet rP does not account properly for the non-stationarity of the signals recorded in neuroimaging. In this study, we introduced a novel estimator of coupled dynamics termed multiscale detrended cross-correlation coefficient (MDC3). Firstly, we showed that MDC3 had higher accuracy compared to rP using simulated time series with known coupling, as well as simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals with known underlying structural connectivity. Next, we computed functional brain networks based on empirical magnetoencephalography (MEG) and fMRI. We found that by using MDC3 we could construct networks of healthy populations with significantly different properties compared to rP networks. Based on our results, we believe that MDC3 is a valid alternative to rP that should be incorporated in future FC studies. Author SummaryThe brain consists of a vastly interconnected network of regions. To estimate the connection strength of such networks the coupling between different brain regions should be calculated. This can be achieved by using a series of statistical methods that capture the connection strength between signals originating across the brain, one of them being Pearsons correlation (rP). Despite its benefits, rP is not suitable for realistic estimation of brain network architecture. In this study, we introduced a novel estimator called multiscale detrended cross-correlation coefficient (MDC3). Firstly, we showed that MDC3 was more accurate than rP using simulated signals with known connection strength, as well as simulated brain activity emerging from realistic brain simulations. Next, we constructed brain networks based on real-life brain activity, recorded using two different methodologies. We found that by using MDC3 we could construct networks of healthy populations with significantly different properties compared to rP networks. Based on our results, we believe that MDC3 is a valid alternative to rP that should be incorporated in future studies of brain networks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 38%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimation of task-based modulations in functional connectivity with MEG: a comparison of methods
Juan L. P. Soto, Karim Jerbi·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2018
- Nonlinear brain connectivity from neurons to networks: quantification, sources and localization.
Giulio Tani Raffaelli, Stanislav Jiříček, Jaroslav Hlinka·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2024
- Mathematical relations between measures of brain connectivity estimated from electrophysiological recordings for Gaussian distributed data
Guido Nolte, Edgar E. Galindo-Leon, … Andreas Karl Engel·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2020
- The more, the merrier: multivariate phase synchronization methods excel pairwise ones in estimating brain connectivity from reconstructed neural sources
- Dynamical differential covariance recovers directional network structure in multiscale neural systems
Yusi Chen, Burke Q. Rosen, Terrence J. Sejnowski A B·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2022
- Benchmarking methods for mapping functional connectivity in the brain
Zhen-Qi Liu, Andrea I. Luppi, … Bratislav Mišić·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2025