Birth Defects ResearchGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Functional annotation of de novo variants found near GWAS loci associated with cleft lip with or without cleft palate
Sarah W. CurtisiD, Laura CookiD, Kitt D. ParaisoiD, Axel ViseliD, Justin L. CotneyiD, Jeffrey Clark MurrayiD, Terri H. BeatyiD, Mary L. MarazitaiD, Jenna C. CarlsoniD, Elizabeth J. LeslieiD
Abstract
Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are the most common craniofacial birth defects, affecting 1 in 700 births, and have a strong genetic basis with a high recurrence risk within families. While many of the previous studies have associated common, noncoding genetic loci with OFCs, previous studies on de novo variants (DNVs) in OFC cases have focused on coding variants that could have a functional impact on protein structure, and the contribution of noncoding DNVs to the formation of OFCs has largely been ignored and is not well understood. Therefore, we reanalyzed an existing dataset of DNVs from 1,409 trios with OFCs that had undergone targeted sequencing of known OFC-associated loci. We then annotated these DNVs with information from datasets of predicted epigenetic function during human craniofacial development. Of the 66 DNVs in this cohort, 17 (25.7%) were within a predicted enhancer or promotor region. Two DNVs fell within the same enhancer region (hs1617), which is more than expected by chance (p = 0.0017). The sequence changes caused by these DNVs are predicted to create binding sites not seen in the reference sequence for transcription factors PAX6 and ZBTB7A and to disrupt binding sites for STAT1 and STAT3. This enhancer region is within the same topologically-associated domain as HHAT, SERTAD4, and IRF6, all of which are involved in craniofacial development. All three genes are highly expressed in human neural crest cells. Knockout mice for Hhat and Irf6 have abnormal embryonic development including a cleft palate, and variants in and around IRF6 are associated with nonsyndromic and syndromic forms of OFCs in humans. Taken together, this suggests that noncoding DNVs contribute to the genetic architecture of OFCs, with a burden of DNVs in OFC trios in enhancer regions near known OFC-associated genes. Overall, this adds to our understanding of the genetic mechanisms that underly OFC formation.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Field percentile
- top 23%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of functional non-coding variants associated with orofacial cleft
Priyanka Kumari, Ryan Z. Friedman, … Robert A. Cornell·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2025
- Coding de novo mutations identified by WGS reveal novel orofacial cleft genes
Madison R. Bishop, Kimberly K. Diaz Perez, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2020
- Characterization of de novo structural variants in trios with orofacial clefts
Kelsey R. Robinson, Sarah W. Curtis, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·medRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Comprehensive analysis of de novo variants across 2,497 orofacial cleft trios reveals novel genetic drivers of disease
Nehir Edibe Kurtas, Alba Sanchis‐Juan, … Harrison Brand·medRxiv·May 24, 2026
- Association of DOT1L histone methyltransferase with non-syndromic orofacial clefts in a cohort of children of African and Asian ancestry
Timothy Becker, Dashzeveg Bayarsaihan, Dong‐Guk Shin·medRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- Rare genetic variants in SEC24D modify orofacial cleft phenotypes
Sarah W. Curtis, Jenna C. Carlson, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·medRxiv·Mar 24, 2023