Nature CommunicationsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Identification of functional non-coding variants associated with orofacial cleft
Priyanka KumariiD, Ryan Z. FriedmaniD, Sarah W. CurtisiD, Lira PiiD, Kitt D. ParaisoiD, Axel ViseliD, Lindsey RheaiD, Martine DunnwaldiD, Anjali P. PatniiD, Daniel Mar, Karol BomsztykiD, Julie MathieuiD, Hannele Ruohola‐BakeriD, Elizabeth J. LeslieiD, Michael A. WhiteiD, Barak A. CoheniD, Robert A. CornelliD
Abstract
Oral facial cleft (OFC) is a multifactorial disorder that can present as a cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) or a cleft palate only. Genome wide association studies (GWAS) of isolated OFC have identified common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the 1q32/IRF6 locus and many other loci where, like IRF6, the presumed OFC-relevant gene is expressed in embryonic oral epithelium. To identify the functional subset of SNPs at eight such loci we conducted a massively parallel reporter assay in a cell line derived from fetal oral epithelium, revealing SNPs with allele-specific effects on enhancer activity. We filtered these against chromatin-mark evidence of enhancers in relevant cell types or tissues, and then tested a subset in traditional reporter assays, yielding six candidates for functional SNPs in five loci (1q32/IRF6, 3q28/TP63, 6p24.3/TFAP2A, 20q12/MAFB, and 9q22.33/FOXE1). We further tested two SNPs near IRF6 and one near FOXE1 by engineering the genome of induced pluripotent stem cells, differentiating the cells into embryonic oral epithelium, and measuring expression of IRF6 or FOXE1 and binding of transcription factors; the results strongly supported their candidacy. Conditional analyses of a meta-analysis of GWAS suggest that the two functional SNPs near IRF6 account for the majority of risk for CL/P associated with variation at this locus. This study connects genetic variation associated with orofacial cleft to mechanisms of pathogenesis.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: fine-mapping
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Functional annotation of de novo variants found near GWAS loci associated with cleft lip with or without cleft palate
Sarah W. Curtis, Laura Cook, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·Birth Defects ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Methylation quantitative loci analysis in nonsyndromic orofacial clefts
Aline Lourenço Petrin, Ligiane Alves Machado‐Paula, … Lina M. Moreno Uribe·Molecular Genetics and GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2026
- Leveraging the genetics of human face shape boosts the discovery of orofacial cleft risk loci
Noah Herrick, Seppe Goovaerts, … Seth M. Weinberg·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2026
- Variants in CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1 are associated with orofacial cleft risk
Jenna C. Carlson, Xinyi Zhang, … John R. Shaffer·medRxiv·Jan 21, 2025
- Rare genetic variants in SEC24D modify orofacial cleft phenotypes
Sarah W. Curtis, Jenna C. Carlson, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·medRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- High incidence and geographic distribution of cleft palate cases in Finland are associated with a regulatory variant in IRF6
Fedik Rahimov, Pekka Nieminen, … David P. C. Rice·medRxiv·Jul 9, 2024