bioRxivPharmacology & Toxicology
Missing genomic resources for the next generation of environmental risk assessment
Abstract
Environmental risk assessment traditionally relies on a wide range of in vivo testing to assess the potential hazard of chemicals in the environment. These tests are often time-consuming, costly and can cause test organisms suffering. Recent developments of reliable low-cost alternatives, both in vivo- and in silico-based, opened the door to reconsider current toxicity assessment. However, many of these new approach methodologies (NAMs) rely on high quality annotated genomes for surrogate species of the regulatory risk assessment. Currently, lacking genomic information slows the process of NAM development. Here, we present a phylogenetically resolved overview of missing genomic resources for surrogate species within regulatory ecotoxicological risk assessment. We call for an organized and systematic effort within the (regulatory) ecotoxicological community to provide these missing genomic resources. Further, we discuss the potential of a standardized genomic surrogate species landscape to enable a robust and non-animal reliant ecotoxicological risk assessment in the systems ecotoxicology era. Synopsis StatementWe identify missing genomic resources needed for the development and regulatory acceptance of new approach methodologies in environmental risk assessment.
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Resource requirements for ecotoxicity testing: A comparison of traditional and new approach methods
- Variability and uncertainty of data from genotoxicity Test Guidelines: What we know and why it matters.
Giuseppa Raitano, Tessa E. Pronk, … Martin Paparella·Archives of ToxicologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2026
- Development of genomic resources for four potential environmental bioindicator species: Isoperla grammatica, Amphinemura sulcicollis, Oniscus asellus and Baetis rhodani.
Hannah C Macdonald, Luis Cunha, Michael W Bruford·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2016
- Risk assessments underestimate threat of pesticides to wild bees
R. S. Shahmohamadloo, M. L. Tissier, L. M. Guzman·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2023
- Natural variation suggests candidate genes underlying Caenorhabditis elegans susceptibility to diverse toxicants
Timothy A. Crombie, Ryan McKeown, … Erik C. Andersen·Toxicological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2026
- Defining the data gap: what do we know about environmental exposure, hazards and risks of pharmaceuticals in the European aquatic environment?
F. D. Spilsbury, P. A. Inostroza, … T. Backhaus·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2023