Dynamical Origin for Winner-Take-All Competition in A Biological Network of The Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus
Abstract
We consider a biological network of the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG). The DG is a pre-processor for pattern separation which facilitates pattern storage and retrieval in the CA3 area of the hippocampus. The main encoding cells in the DG are the granule cells (GCs) which receive the input from the entorhinal cortex (EC) and send their output to the CA3. We note that the activation degree of GCs is so low (~ 5%). This sparsity has been thought to enhance the pattern separation. We investigate the dynamical origin for winner-take-all (WTA) competition which leads to sparse activation of the GCs. The whole GCs are grouped into lamellar clusters. In each GC cluster, there is one inhibitory (I) basket cell (BC) along with excitatory (E) GCs. There are three kinds of external inputs into the GCs; the direct excitatory EC input, the indirect inhibitory EC input, mediated by the HIPP (hilar perforant path-associated) cells, and the excitatory input from the hilar mossy cells (MCs). The firing activities of the GCs are determined via competition between the external E and I inputs. The E-I conductance ratio [Formula] (given by the time average of the external E to I conductances) may represents well the degree of such external E-I input competition. It is thus found that GCs become active when their [Formula] is larger than a threshold [Formula], and then the mean firing rates of the active GCs are strongly correlated with [Formula]. In each GC cluster, the feedback inhibition of the BC may select the winner GCs. GCs with larger [Formula] than the threshold [Formula] survive, and they become winners; all the other GCs with smaller [Formula] become silent. In this way, WTA competition occurs via competition between the firing activity of the GCs and the feedback inhibition from the BC in each GC cluster. In this case, the hilar MCs are also found to play an essential role of enhancing the WTA competition in each GC cluster by exciting both the GCs and the BC. PACS numbers: 87.19.lj, 87.19.lm, 87.19.lv
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Field percentile
- top 26%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Disynaptic Effect of Hilar Cells on Pattern Separation in A Spiking Neural Network of Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus
Sang-Yoon Kim, Woochang Lim·Cognitive NeurodynamicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2022
- Population and Individual Firing Behaviors in Sparsely Synchronized Rhythms in The Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus
- Effect of Adult-Born Immature Granule Cells on Pattern Separation in The Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus
S.-Y. Kim, W. Lim·Cognitive NeurodynamicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- GABAergic inhibition differentially gates recruitment of dentate gyrus interneurons by lateral entorhinal cortex inputs.
Johannes Köhler, Marlene Bartos, Claudio Elgueta·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2026
- Dendrites of DG granule cells contribute to pattern separation by controlling sparsity
Spyridon Chavlis, Panagiotis C Petrantonakis, Panayiota Poirazi·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2016
- Dentate spikes and external control of hippocampal function
Dino Dvořák, Ain Chung, … André Antonio Fenton·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2021