The Implementation, Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Outcome of Genetic Testing on an Inpatient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Service
Aaron D. BestermaniD, Joshua SadikiD, Michael J. Enenbach, Fabiola Quintero‐RiveraiD, Mark DeAntonio, Julián A. Martínez-AgostoiD
Abstract
ObjectiveDiagnostic genetic testing is recommended for children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). However, many children with NDDs do not receive genetic testing. One approach to improve access to genetic services for these patients is to offer testing on the inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) service. MethodsWe implemented systematic genetic testing on an inpatient CAP service by providing medical genetics education to CAP fellows. We compared the genetic testing rates pre- and post-education. We compared the diagnostic yield to previously published studies and the demographics of our cohort to inpatients who received genetic testing on other clinical services. We assessed rates of outpatient genetics follow-up post-discharge. ResultsThe genetic testing rate on the inpatient CAP service was 1.6% (2/125) before the educational intervention and 10.7% (21/197) afterwards (OR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.015- 0.58, p = 0.0015). Diagnostic yield for patients on the inpatient service was 4.3% (1/23), lower than previously reported. However, 34.8% (8/23) of patients had variants of unknown significance (VUSs). 39.1% (9/23) of children who received genetic testing while inpatients were underrepresented minorities, compared to 7.7% (1/13) of patients who received genetic testing on other clinical services (OR = 7.35, CI = 0.81-365.00, p = 0.057). 43.5% of patients were lost to outpatient genetics follow-up. ConclusionMedical genetics education for fellows on an inpatient CAP service can improve genetic testing rates. Genetic testing for inpatients may primarily identify VUSs instead of well-known NDD risk variants. Genetic testing on the inpatient CAP service may improve access to genetic services for underrepresented minorities, but assuring outpatient follow-up can be challenging.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Field percentile
- top 32%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic Counselor Utilization Across Non-Genetics Departments for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Jordan Janae Cole, Julie S. Cohen, … Colleen A. Campbell·medRxiv·Jul 21, 2026
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders
H. Copeland, Emma C. Kivuva, … Caroline Fiona Wright·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2021
- Change in movement disorder specialist attitudes to genetic testing after implementation of PD GENEration
Jesse Wang, Vanessa Ibrahim, … Anne-Marie A. Wills·Genetics in Medicine OpenPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Genomics-informed Neuropsychiatric Care for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Results from A Multidisciplinary Clinic
Aaron D. Besterman, David J. Adams, … Shafali Jeste·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2024
- Information and genetic counselling for psychiatric risks in children with rare genomic disorders
Andrew Cuthbert, Aimée Challenger, … Marianne B. M. van den Bree·medRxiv·Sep 25, 2019
- Information and genetic counselling for psychiatric risks in children with rare disorders
Andrew Cuthbert, Aimée Challenger, … Marianne B. M. van den Bree·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2019