Sign in
PhysiologybioRxiv
Preprint

SPARK: Physiology-informed inference of latent cardiac autonomic dynamics from RR intervals

Matias Castillo-AguilariD, Noah BeeldersiD, Cristian Nunez-EspinosaiD

Abstract

Cardiac autonomic activity is observed only through beat-to-beat (RR) intervals, and separating it into parasympathetic-like and sympathetic-like components is an inverse problem that RR alone is not expected to solve uniquely. We introduce SPARK (Stochastic Phase-domain Autonomic Reconstruction Kinetics), a state-space model in which two independent, mean-reverting latent drives modulate heart rate through an integrate-and-fire pacemaker. The model is combined with exact continuous-time Kalman filtering and with an explicit physiological identification structure: time-scale priors, a kinetic ordering and a spectral partition of heart rate variability. SPARK offers a model-conditional description of autonomic trajectories that complements conventional heart rate variability; its latent states are reconstructions, not measurements of neural activity. Across recordings, fitting each recording from many different starting points gave a median of 23.5 distinct solutions without physiological information versus 1.0 with it, and one process absorbed essentially all the variability in 75% versus 4% of the fits; the fit diagnostics showed residual structure in most recordings. Reconstructions were then examined: in 10 tilt-table recordings, the vagal-like state decreased and the sympathetic-like state increased in 10 of 10; exploratory comparisons between 20 young and 20 older adults showed differences in reconstructed variability and faster-component kinetics, although several latent summaries were mathematically redundant; and in 263 exercise recordings, median recovery times, which are closely tied to the fitted time constants, were 42 s (vagal-like) and 341 s (sympathetic-like). How a stressor-induced change is split between the two drives remained sensitive to the spectral anchor.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.