NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
EEG Microstates Reveal Differential Network Dynamics under Constant Current and Oscillatory Brain Stimulation
Inga Griškova-BulanovaiD, Povilas TarailisiD, Marko ŽivanovićiD, Saša R. FilipovićiD, Jovana BjekićiD
Abstract
BackgroundEEG microstates are brief, quasi-stable scalp topographies that index large-scale network dynamics and may sensitively capture the net effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). ObjectiveTo evaluate differential effects of three types of tES - tDCS, tACS and oscillatory tDCS - (otDCS), on canonical EEG microstates (A-D) in healthy adults. MethodsIn a randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study, 42 participants completed four sessions (tDCS, tACS, otDCS, sham). Stimulation (20 min) used a P3-cheek montage: tDCS +1.5 mA; tACS at individualized theta frequency (ITF, 4-8 Hz), {+/-}1 mA; otDCS anodal with {+/-}0.5 mA oscillation around +1.5 mA at ITF. A five-minute resting EEG (eyes closed then eyes open) was recorded pre- and post-intervention. Microstates were extracted (A-D), back-fitted, and assessed on duration, occurrence, contribution, and mean GFP using linear mixed-effects models with sham and pre/post adjustments. ResultsFour canonical microstates explained ~80% variance with stable topographies across conditions. Modulation patterns were modality-specific. MS A (sensory/arousal) increased across all active protocols, strongest after otDCS. MS B (visual-autobiographical) was consistently suppressed, again most following otDCS. MS C (self-referential) decreased selectively after oscillatory stimulation (tACS, otDCS) only. MS D (executive/attention) diverged by waveform: enhanced by tACS and otDCS but reduced by tDCS. Across outcomes, otDCS produced the largest and most widespread effects, overlapping features of both tDCS (tonic/stabilizing) and tACS (oscillatory/entraining) influences. ConclusionsResting-state EEG microstates provide a sensitive systems-level assay of tES aftereffects. Constant and oscillatory current waveforms reorganize network states in dissociable ways, with otDCS exerting the most robust, comprehensive modulation. These findings support microstates as practical biomarkers for differentiating, optimizing, and monitoring neuromodulation strategies.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Individual-specific effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses
Aurimas Mockevičius, Xiaojuan Wang, … Inga Griškova-Bulanova·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities
Natalie Schaworonkow, Jochen Triesch, … Christoph Zrenner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018
- Computational Insights into the tACS Modulation in Healthy and Epileptic Brain Networks
Mariam Al Harrach, Maxime Yochum, … Fabrice Wendling·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- Stimulation parameters shape effective connectivity pathways: insights from microstate analysis on TMS-evoked potentials
Delia Lucarelli, Giacomo Guidali, … Marta Bortoletto·Brain TopographyPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2025
- Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation
Ivan Alekseichuk, Arnaud Falchier, … Alexander Opitz·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2019
- Brain state and polarity dependent modulation of brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation
Lucia M. Li, Inês R. Violante, … David James Sharp·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2018