Sign in
NeuroscienceBrain stimulation
Peer-reviewed journal article

EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities

Natalie SchaworonkowiD, Jochen TrieschiD, Ulf ZiemanniD, Christoph ZrenneriD

Abstract

BackgroundCorticospinal excitability depends on the current brain state. The recent development of real-time EEG-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (EEG-TMS) allows studying this relationship in a causal fashion. Specifically, it has been shown that corticospinal excitability is higher during the scalp surface negative EEG peak compared to the positive peak of {micro}-oscillations in sensorimotor cortex, as indexed by larger motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for fixed stimulation intensity.\n\nObjectiveWe further characterize the effect of {micro}-rhythm phase on the MEP input-output (IO) curve by measuring the degree of excitability modulation across a range of stimulation intensities. We furthermore seek to optimize stimulation parameters to enable discrimination of functionally relevant EEG-defined brain states.\n\nMethodsA real-time EEG-TMS system was used to trigger MEPs during instantaneous brain-states corresponding to {micro}-rhythm surface positive and negative peaks with five different stimulation intensities covering an individually calibrated MEP IO curve in 15 healthy participants.\n\nResultsMEP amplitude is modulated by {micro}-phase across a wide range of stimulation intensities, with larger MEPs at the surface negative peak. The largest relative MEP-modulation was observed for weak intensities, the largest absolute MEP-modulation for intermediate intensities. These results indicate a leftward shift of the MEP IO curve during the {micro}-rhythm negative peak.\n\nConclusionThe choice of stimulation intensity influences the observed degree of corticospinal excitability modulation by {micro}-phase. Lower stimulation intensities enable more efficient differentiation of EEG {micro}-phase-defined brain states.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
135
FWCI
5.50
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.