Sign in
Systems BiologyPLOS complex systems.
Peer-reviewed journal article

A Single-Graph Visualization to Reveal Hidden Explainability Patterns of SHAP Feature Interactions in Machine Learning for Biomedical Issues

Félix Furger, Julien AligoniD, Miguel Thomas, Emmanuel DoumardiD, Cyrille DelpierreiD, Louis CasteillaiD, Paul MonsarratiD

Abstract

BackgroundIn the last decades, the utility of Machine Learning (ML) in the biomedical domain has been demonstrated repeatedly. Their inherent opacity need augmenting ML with explainability techniques. A common practice in model explainability however, is to focus solely on the explanatory values themselves without accounting for both the main and interaction effects. While this approach simplifies interpretation, it potentially overlooks critical medical information since the nature of the interactions may provide clues to the underlying biological mechanisms. ResultsThis article introduces a novel method for analyzing explanatory values of machine learning (ML) models, in the form of a comprehensive graphical visualization. The method not only emphasises the individual contributions of the features but also gives insights about the interactions they share with one another. Designed for local additive explanation methods, the proposed tool effectively translates the complex and multidimensional nature of these values into an intuitive single-graph format. It offers a clear window into how feature interactions contribute to the overall prediction of the ML model while aiding in the identification of various interaction types, such as mutual attenuation, positive/negative synergies or dominance of one feature over another. ConclusionsThis approach provides insights for generating hypotheses, improving the transparency of ML models, particularly in the context of biology and medicine since living organisms are characterised by a multitude of parameters in complex interactions, a complexity that ensures the "stability" and robustness of structures and functions.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
4
FWCI
1.62
Field percentile
top 15%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.