Sign in
Evolutionary BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Beta-coalescents when sample size is large

Jonathan A. Chetwynd-Diggle, Bjarki EldoniD

Abstract

Individual recruitment success, or the offspring number distribution of a given population, is a fundamental element in ecology and evolution. Sweepstakes reproduction refers to a highly skewed individual recruitment success without involving natural selection and may apply to individuals in broadcast spawning populations characterised by Type III survivorship. We consider an extension of the Schweinsberg (2003) model of sweepstakes reproduction for a haploid panmictic population of constant size N; the extension also works as an alternative to the Wright-Fisher model. Our model incorporates an upper bound on the random number of potential offspring (juveniles) produced by a given individual. Depending on how the bound behaves relative to the total population size, we obtain the Kingman (1982a,c,b) coalescent, an incomplete Beta-coalescent, or the (complete) Beta-coalescent of Schweinsberg (2003). We argue that applying such an upper bound is biologically reasonable. Moreover, we estimate the error of the coalescent approximation. The error estimates reveal that convergence can be slow, and small sample size can be sufficient to invalidate convergence, for example if the stated bound is of the form N/ log N. We use simulations to investigate the effect of increasing sample size on the site-frequency spectrum. When the limit is a Beta-coalescent, the site frequency spectrum will be as predicted by the limiting tree even though the full coalescent tree may deviate from the limiting one. When in the domain of attraction of the Kingman coalescent the effect of increasing sample size depends on the effective population size as has been noted in the case of the Wright-Fisher model. Conditioning on the population ancestry (the random ancestral relations of the entire population at all times) may have little effect on the site-frequency spectrum for the models considered here (as evidenced by simulation results).

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMelfi '18Eldon '26Melfi '18Lauterbur '19Eldon '26Kersting '21
77% semantic matchGenetics
Andrew Melfi, Divakar Viswanath·Theoretical Population Biology·Apr 12, 2018· 10 citations