Wolverine density distribution reflects past persecution and current management in Scandinavia
Abstract
After centuries of intense persecution, several large carnivore species in Europe and North America have experienced a rebound. Todays spatial configuration of large carnivore populations has likely arisen from the interplay between their ecological traits and current environmental conditions, but also from their history of persecution and protection. Yet, due to the challenge of studying population-level phenomena, we are rarely able to disentangle and quantify the influence of past and present factors driving the spatial distribution and density of these controversial species. Using spatial capture-recapture models and a data set of 742 genetically identified wolverines Gulo gulo collected over [1/2] million km2 across their entire range in Norway and Sweden, we identify landscape-level factors explaining the current population density of wolverines in the Scandinavian Peninsula. Distance from the relic range along the Swedish-Norwegian border, where the wolverine population survived a long history of persecution, remains a key determinant of wolverine density today. However, regional differences in management and environmental conditions also played an important role in shaping spatial patterns in present-day wolverine density. Specifically, we found evidence of slower recolonization in areas that had set lower wolverine population goals in terms of the desired number of annual reproductions. Management of transboundary large carnivore populations at biologically relevant scales may be inhibited by administrative fragmentation. Yet, as our study shows, population-level monitoring is an achievable prerequisite for a comprehensive understanding of the distribution and density of large carnivores across an increasingly anthropogenic landscape.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mapping and explaining wolf recolonization in France using dynamic occupancy models and opportunistic data
J. Louvrier, C. Duchamp, … O. Gimenez·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2017
- Population responses of naive roe deer to the recolonization of the French Vercors by wolves
M. Randon, C. Bonenfant, … M. VALEIX·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2019
- Reaching reproduction in a large carnivore: role of early environment and intrinsic traits
Léa Auclair, Cecilia Di Bernardi, … Camilla Wikenros·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2025
- Instrumented individuals are not representative of the population. Survival of wolverines with and without GPS collars
C. Milleret, R. Bischof, … J. Mattisson·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2020
- Extreme spatial plasticity in Italian wolves: ecological determinants of range size and movement patterns across heterogeneous landscapes
Silvia Cavazza, Rudy Brogi, … Marco Apollonio·European Journal of Wildlife ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2026
- Forecasting dynamics of a recolonizing wolf population under different management strategies
L. S. Petracca, B. Gardner, … S. J. Converse·Animal ConservationPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2025