Forecasting dynamics of a recolonizing wolf population under different management strategies
Abstract
Species recovery can be influenced by a wide variety of factors, such that predicting the spatiotemporal dynamics of recovering species can be exceedingly difficult. These predictions, however, are valuable for decision makers tasked with managing species and determining their legal status. We applied a novel spatially explicit projection model to estimate population viability of gray wolves (Canis lupus) from 2021-2070 in Washington State, USA, where wolves have been naturally recolonizing since the establishment of the first resident pack in 2008. Using this model, we predicted the effects of 12 scenarios of interest relating to management actions (e.g., lethal removals, translocation, harvest) and system uncertainties (e.g., immigration from out of state, disease) on the probability of meeting Washingtons wolf recovery goals, along with other metrics related to population status. Population recovery was defined under Washingtons Wolf Conservation and Management Plan as four breeding pairs in each of three recovery regions and three additional breeding pairs anywhere in the state. The baseline, translocation, and 50% immigration scenarios indicated a high (>60%) probability of wolf recovery in Washington over the next 50 years, but scenarios related to harvest mortality (removal of 5% of the population every six months), increased lethal removals (removal of 30% of the population every four years), and cessation of immigration from out of state resulted in low probabilities (0.07, 0.12, and 0.12, respectively) of meeting recovery goals across all years (2021-2070). All but one management scenarios exhibited a geometric mean of population growth that was [≥]1, indicating long-term population stability or growth, depending on the scenario. Our results suggest that wolves will continue to recolonize Washington and that recovery goals will be met so long as harvest and lethal removals are not at unsustainable levels and adjacent populations support immigration into Washington.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Merging integrated population models and individual-based models to project population dynamics of recolonizing species
L. S. Petracca, B. Gardner, … S. J. Converse·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2023
- Mapping and explaining wolf recolonization in France using dynamic occupancy models and opportunistic data
J. Louvrier, C. Duchamp, … O. Gimenez·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2017
- Rule-based habitat suitability modelling for the reintroduction of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) in Scotland
V. Gwynn, E. Symeonakis·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2022
- Intra- and interspecific relationships of alpine ungulates reorganise along a wolf recolonisation gradient
Federico Ossi, Andrea Corradini, … Francesca Cagnacci·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- Wolverine density distribution reflects past persecution and current management in Scandinavia
E. Moqanaki, C. Milleret, … R. Bischof·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2022
- Population responses of naive roe deer to the recolonization of the French Vercors by wolves
M. Randon, C. Bonenfant, … M. VALEIX·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2019