Using accelerometers to infer behaviour of cryptic species in the wild
L. Benoit, N. C. Bonnot, L. Debeffe, D. Gremillet, A. J. M. Hewison, L. Puch, P. Marchand, A. Bonnet, B. Cargnelutti, N. Cebe, B. Lourtet, A. Coulon, N. Morellet
Abstract
Accelerometery is revolutionising the field of behavioural ecology through its capacity to detect the fine-scale movements of animals resulting from their behaviour. Because it is often difficult to infer the behaviour of wildlife on a continuous basis, particularly for cryptic species, accelerometers potentially provide powerful tools for remote monitoring of their behavioural responses to the environment. The goal of this study was to provide a detailed, calibrated methodology, including practical guidelines, to infer the behaviour of free-ranging animals from acceleration data. This approach can be employed to reliably infer the time budget of species that are difficult to observe in certain environments or at certain times of the day. To this end, we trained several behavioural classification algorithms with accelerometer data obtained on captive roe deer, then validated these algorithms with data obtained on free-ranging roe deer, and finally predicted the time-budgets of a substantial sample of unobserved free-ranging roe deer in a human-dominated landscape. The best classification algorithm was the Random Forest which predicted five behavioural classes with a high overall level of accuracy ({approx} 90%). Except for grooming (34-38%), we were able to predict the behaviour of free-ranging roe deer over the course of a day with high accuracy, in particular, foraging head down, running, walking and immobile (68-94%). Applied to free-ranging individuals, the classification allowed us to estimate, for example, that roe deer spent about twice as much time foraging head-down, walking or running during dawn and dusk than during daylight or night-time. By integrating step by step calibration and validation of accelerometer data prior to application in the wild, our approach is transferable to other free-ranging animals for predicting key behaviours in cryptic species.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Leveraging machine learning and accelerometry to classify animal behaviours with uncertainty
Medha Agarwal, Kasim Rafiq, … Zaïd Harchaoui·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2025
- A simple method to classify behaviours of aerial predators using tri-axial high-frequency accelerometers
Daniel García‐Silveira, Simon Benhamou, … Javier Bustamante·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2025
- Classifier architecture and data preprocessing jointly shape accelerometer-based behavioural inference
Loïc Brun, Jonas Mateo Brady Rothrock, … Ebi Antony George·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2026
- Resolving platypus behaviour from accelerometry: frequency-domain features improve detection of rhythmic behaviours in hydrodynamically challenging aquatic environments
Breony Webb, Mick Ryan, Jessica L. Thomas·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2026
- Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviour
- Uncovering hidden behaviours: a GPS-Accelerometry approach to behaviour classification in storm-petrels
Dan L. Wilkinson, Adam Kane, … John L. Quinn·Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2026