Spatial alignment between faces and voices improves selective attention to audio-visual speech
Justin T. FlemingiD, Ross K. MaddoxiD, Barbara G. Shinn‐CunninghamiD
Abstract
The ability to see a talkers face has long been known to improve speech intelligibility in noise. This perceptual benefit depends on approximate temporal alignment between the auditory and visual speech components. However, the practical role that cross-modal spatial alignment plays in integrating audio-visual (AV) speech remains unresolved, particularly when competing talkers are present. In a series of online experiments, we investigated the importance of spatial alignment between corresponding faces and voices using a paradigm that featured both acoustic masking (speech-shaped noise) and attentional demands from a competing talker. Participants selectively attended a Target Talkers speech, then identified a word spoken by the Target Talker. In Exp. 1, we found improved task performance when the talkers faces were visible, but only when corresponding faces and voices were presented in the same hemifield (spatially aligned). In Exp. 2, we tested for possible influences of eye position on this result. In auditory-only conditions, directing gaze toward the distractor voice reduced performance as predicted, but this effect could not fully explain the cost of AV spatial misalignment. Finally, in Exp. 3 and 4, we show that the effect of AV spatial alignment changes with noise level, but this was limited by a floor effect: due to the use of closed-set stimuli, participants were able to perform the task relatively well using lipreading alone. However, comparison between the results of Exp. 1 and Exp. 3 suggests that the cost of AV misalignment is larger at high noise levels. Overall, these results indicate that spatial alignment between corresponding faces and voices is important for AV speech integration in attentionally demanding communication settings.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Humans rely more on talker identity than temporal coherence in an audiovisual selective attention task using speech-like stimuli
Madeline S. Cappelloni, Vincent S. Mateo, Ross K. Maddox·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2022
- Independent mechanisms of temporal and linguistic cue correspondence benefiting audiovisual speech processing
S. Fiscella, M. S. Cappelloni, R. K. Maddox·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2020
- Face Viewing Behavior Predicts Multisensory Gain During Speech Perception
Johannes Rennig, Kira Wegner‐Clemens, Michael S. Beauchamp·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2019
- Visual contributions to the perception of speech in noise
Lida C Alampounti, Hannah E. Cooper, … Jennifer K. Bizley·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2025
- Neurophysiological indices of audiovisual speech integration are enhanced at the phonetic level for speech in noise
Aisling E. O’Sullivan, Michael J. Crosse, … Edmund C. Lalor·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2020
- Differential auditory and visual phase-locking are observed during audio-visual benefit and silent lip-reading for speech perception
Máté Aller, Heidi Solberg Økland, … Matthew H. Davis·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2022