henhaobio
Sign in

NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Attentional effects on local V1 microcircuits explain selective V1-V4 communication

Christini KatsanevakiiD, André M. BastosiD, Hayriye CagnaniD, Conrado A. BosmaniD, Karl John FristoniD, Pascal FriesiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Selective attention implements preferential routing of attended stimuli, likely through increasing the influence of the respective synaptic inputs on higher-area neurons. As the inputs of competing stimuli converge onto postsynaptic neurons, presynaptic circuits might offer the best target for attentional top-down influences. If those influences enabled presynaptic circuits to selectively entrain postsynaptic neurons, this might explain selective routing. Indeed, when two visual stimuli induce two gamma rhythms in V1, only the gamma induced by the attended stimulus entrains gamma in V4. Here, we modeled induced responses with a Dynamic Causal Model for Cross-Spectral Densities and found that selective entrainment can be explained by attentional modulation of intrinsic V1 connections. Specifically, local inhibition was decreased in the granular input layer and increased in the supragranular output layer of the V1 circuit that processed the attended stimulus. Thus, presynaptic attentional influences and ensuing entrainment were sufficient to mediate selective routing. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIWe model selective visual attention in macaques using Dynamic Causal Modeling. C_LIO_LIIntrinsic V1 modulation can explain attention effects in V1-V4 communication. C_LIO_LIModulation of superficial and granular inhibition is key to induce the effects. C_LIO_LIThose modulations increase V1-V4 communication in a feedforward manner. C_LI GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=97 SRC="FIGDIR/small/484223v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc79a7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@146e6bdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d6bd6borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12dd663_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Citations
14
FWCI
2.09
Field percentile
top 13%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGrothe '15Ferro '21Spyropoulos '24Berga '20Ghosh '21Pascucci '18
80% semantic matchNeuroscience
Iris Grothe, David Rotermund, Simon D. Neitzel+4 more·bioRxiv·May 19, 2015