A new pipeline for the normalization and pooling of metabolomics data
Vivian VialloniD, Mathilde HisiD, Sabina RinaldiiD, Marie BreeuriD, Audrey Gicquiau, Bertrand Hémon, Kim OvervadiD, Anne Marie TjønnelandiD, Agnetha Linn Rostgaard‐HanseniD, Joseph A. RothwelliD, Lucie LécuyeriD, Gianluca SeveriiD, Rudolf KaaksiD, Theron JohnsoniD, Matthias Bernd SchulzeiD, Domenico PalliiD, Claudia AgnoliiD, Salvatore PanicoiD, Rosario TuminoiD, Fulvio RicceriiD, W. M. Monique VerschureniD, Peter M. EngelfrietiD, N. Charlotte Onland‐MoretiD, Roel C.H. VermeuleniD, Therese Haugdahl NøstiD, , Pietro FerrariiD
Abstract
Pooling metabolomics data across studies is often desirable to increase the statistical power of the analysis. However, this can raise methodological challenges as several preanalytical and analytical factors could introduce differences in measured concentrations and variability between datasets. Specifically, different studies may use variable sample types (e.g., serum versus plasma) collected, treated and stored according to different protocols, and assayed in different laboratories using different instruments. To address these issues, a new pipeline was developed to normalize and pool metabolomics data through a set of sequential steps: (i) exclusions of the least informative observations and metabolites and removal of outliers; imputation of missing data; (ii) identification of the main sources of variability through PC-PR2 analysis; (iii) application of linear mixed models to remove unwanted variability, including samples originating study and batch, and preserve biological variations while accounting for potential differences in the residual variances across studies. This pipeline was applied to targeted metabolomics data acquired using Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ kits in eight case-control studies nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Comprehensive examination of metabolomics measurements indicated that the pipeline improved the comparability of data across the studies. Our pipeline can be adapted to normalize other molecular data, including biomarkers as well as proteomics data, and could be used for pooling molecular datasets, for example in international consortia, to limit biases introduced by inter-study variability. This versatility of the pipeline makes our work of potential interest to molecular epidemiologists.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 29
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data-adaptive pipeline for filtering and normalizing metabolomics data.
Courtney Schiffman, Lauren M. Petrick, … Sandrine Dudoit·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2018
- Probabilistic quotient's work and pharmacokinetics' contribution: countering size effect in metabolic time series measurements
Mathias Gotsmy, Julia Brunmair, … Jürgen Zanghellini·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2022
- Common data models to streamline metabolomics processing and annotation, and implementation in a Python pipeline
Joshua M. Mitchell, Yuanye Chi, … Shuzhao Li·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2024
- Robust metabolomics data normalization across scales and experimental designs
Matthijs Vynck, Pablo Vangeenderhuysen, … Lynn Vanhaecke·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2026
- hRUV: Hierarchical approach to removal of unwanted variation for large-scale metabolomics data
Tai-Yun Kim, Owen Tang, … Jean Yee Hwa Yang·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2021
- Simulation-based comprehensive study of batch effects in metabolomics studies
Miao Yu, Anna Roszkowska, Janusz B. Pawliszyn·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2019