Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionBMC Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Female fruit flies use social cues to make egg clustering decisions

Emily R. ChurchilliD, Emily K. FowleriD, Lucy A. FriendiD, Marco ArchettiiD, Douglas W. YuiD, Andrew F. G. BourkeiD, Tracey ChapmaniD, Amanda J. BretmaniD

Abstract

BackgroundThe ability to respond plastically to environmental variation is a key determinant of fitness. Females may use cues to strategically place their eggs, for example adjusting the number or location of eggs according to whether other females are present, driving the dynamics of local competition or cooperation. The expression of plasticity in egg laying patterns within individual patches, i.e., in contact clusters or not, represents an additional, under-researched and potentially important opportunity for fitness gains. Clustered eggs might benefit from increased protection or defence, and clustering could facilitate cooperative feeding. However, increased clustering is also expected to increase the risk of over-exploitation through direct competition. These potential benefits and costs likely covary with the number of individuals present, hence egg clustering behaviour within resource patches should be socially responsive. We investigate this new topic using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. ResultsOur mathematical model, parameterised by data, verified that females cluster their eggs non-randomly, and increase clustering as group size increases. We also showed that, as the density of adult females increased, females laid more eggs, laid them faster, and laid more eggs in clusters. Females also preferred to place eggs within existing clusters. Most egg clusters were of mixed maternity. ConclusionsCollectively, the results reveal that females actively express plasticity in egg clustering according to social environment cues and prefer to lay in clusters of mixed maternity, despite the potential for increased competition. These findings are consistent with egg clustering plasticity being selected due to public goods-related benefits.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
2
FWCI
1.94
Field percentile
top 14%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFowler '25Fowler '21Mann '25Tiphaine '21Churchill '21Rakosy '25
79% semantic matchEvolutionary Biology
Emily K. Fowler, Lucy A. Friend, Emily R. Churchill+5 more·Journal of Evolutionary Biology·Jan 17, 2025· 10 citations