eLifeEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Developmental constraints mediate the reversal of temperature effects on the autumn phenology of European beech after the summer solstice
Dominic RebindaineiD, Thomas Ward CrowtheriD, Susanne S. RenneriD, Zhaofei WuiD, Yibiao ZouiD, Lidong MoiD, Haozhi MaiD, Raymo BucheriD, Constantin M. ZohneriD
Abstract
Accurate projections of temperate tree growing seasons under climate change require representing developmental constraints that determine tree resource allocation. Recent work has identified a phenological "switch point" after the summer solstice (21 June), with pre-solstice warming advancing autumn phenology and post-solstice warming delaying it. Here, we propose this switch is flexible and occurs at the compensatory point between the antagonistic effects of early-season development and late-season temperature. We performed trans-solstice climate manipulation experiments on potted European beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings to test (i) how spring leaf-out timing and June-August temperatures influence end-of-season timing (bud set and leaf senescence [50% loss of leaf chlorophyll content]), and (ii) whether daytime and nighttime temperatures before and after the solstice have different effects, given that trees primarily grow at night. Bud set and leaf senescence responses were tightly coupled (R2 = 0.49), with bud responses being generally stronger. Each day delay in spring leaf-out delayed bud set by 0.24 {+/-} 0.06 days and senescence by 0.22 {+/-} 0.08 days. Post-solstice full-day cooling in July delayed autumn phenology in late-leafing individuals (bud set +4.9 {+/-} 2.6 days; senescence +3.1 {+/-} 2.8 days) but had negligible impact on early-leafing trees (bud set +1.4 {+/-} 2.6 days; leaf senescence +2.2 {+/-} 2.8 days). Conversely, August full-day cooling advanced both stages. Daytime cooling before the solstice had no effect, while after the solstice it advanced autumn phenology. Nighttime cooling always delayed bud set. These findings support the Solstice-as-Phenology-Switch model and highlight the central role of developmental progression in constraining growing seasons. Faster early-season development -especially under nighttime warming- moves trees past the switch earlier, increasing sensitivity to late-season cooling and thereby triggering earlier autumn phenology. To improve growing season length projections, phenology models should account for these developmentally-mediated and diel-specific temperature responses.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Greater capacity to exploit warming temperatures in northern populations of European beech is partly driven by delayed leaf senescence
H. Garate-Escamilla, C. C. Brelsford, … M. Benito Garzon·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2019
- Warming sensitivity of spring phenology of deciduous species lies in their bud energy budget
M. Peaucelle, J. Penuelas, H. Verbeeck·bioRxiv·May 3, 2021
- Effects of greening-induced warming and cooling on tree phenology in temperate and boreal forests
- Asymmetric Spring and Autumn Phenology Control Growing Season Length in Temperate Deciduous Forests
Xiaojie Gao, M. A. Friedl, … Jonathan R. Thompson·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2025
- Blue light advances bud burst in branches of three temperate deciduous tree species under short-day conditions
C. C. Brelsford, T. M. Robson·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2018
- Earlier leaf out and loss of cold tolerance for northeastern U.S. trees in response to winter warming events and early springs
Laura Kathryn Pinover, John R. Butnor, … Jay Wason·bioRxiv·May 14, 2025