bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Lip movements and lexical features improve speech tracking differently for clear and multi-speaker speech
Chandra Leon HaideriD, Hyojin ParkiD, Anne HauswaldiD, Nathan WeisziD
- Citations
- 1
Abstract
Visual speech plays a powerful role in facilitating auditory speech processing and has been a publicly noticed topic with the wide usage of face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. In a previous magnetoencephalography (MEG) study we showed that occluding the mouth area significantly impairs neural speech tracking. To rule out the possibility that this deterioration is due to degraded sound quality, in the present follow-up study, we presented participants with audiovisual (AV) and audio-only (A) speech. We further independently manipulated the trials by adding a face mask and a distractor speaker. Our results clearly show that face masks only affect speech tracking in AV conditions, not in A conditions. This shows that face masks indeed primarily impact speech processing by blocking visual speech and not by acoustic degradation. Furthermore, we observe differences in the speech features that are used for visual speech processing. On the one hand, processing in clear speech, but not in noisy speech, is profiting more from lexical unit features (phonemes and word onsets) hinting at improved phoneme discrimination. On the other hand, we observe an improvement in speech tracking driven by the modulations of the lip area in clear speech and conditions with a distractor speaker, which might aid by providing temporal cues for subsequent auditory processing. With this work, we highlight the effects of face masks in AV speech tracking and show two separate ways how visual speech might support successful speech processing.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The impact of face masks on face-to-face neural tracking of speech: auditory and visual obstacles
Marta Fantoni, Alessandra Federici, … Davide Bottari·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2024
- Occlusion of lip movements impairs reconstruction of acoustic speech features and higher-level segmentational features in the presence of a distractor speaker
Chandra Leon Haider, Nina Suess, … Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2021
- Neural speech tracking benefit of lip movements predicts behavioral deterioration when the speaker's mouth is occluded
Patrick Reisinger, Marlies Gillis, … Nathan Weisz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2025
- Articulatory timing and form support distinct neural benefits during audiovisual speech
Aaron R. Nidiffer, Aisling E. O’Sullivan, Edmund C. Lalor·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2026
- Decreasing hearing ability does not lead to improved visual speech extraction as revealed in a neural speech tracking paradigm
Chandra Leon Haider, Anne Hauswald, Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2024
- Differential auditory and visual phase-locking are observed during audio-visual benefit and silent lip-reading for speech perception
Máté Aller, Heidi Solberg Økland, … Matthew H. Davis·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2022