Neural speech tracking benefit of lip movements predicts behavioral deterioration when the speaker's mouth is occluded
Patrick ReisingeriD, Marlies GillisiD, Nina SuessiD, Jonas VanthornhoutiD, Chandra Leon HaideriD, Thomas HartmanniD, Anne HauswaldiD, Konrad SchwarziD, Tom FrancartiD, Nathan WeisziD
Abstract
Observing lip movements of a speaker is known to facilitate speech understanding, especially in challenging listening situations. Converging evidence from neuroscientific studies shows enhanced processing of audiovisual stimuli. However, the interindividual variability of this visual benefit and its consequences on behavior are unknown. Here, we analyzed source-localized magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses from normal-hearing participants listening to audiovisual speech with or without an additional distractor speaker. Using temporal response functions (TRFs), we show that neural responses to lip movements are, in general, enhanced when speech is challenging. After conducting a crucial control for speech acoustics, we show that lip movements effectively contribute to higher neural speech tracking, particularly when a distractor speaker is present. However, the extent of this visual benefit varied greatly among participants. Probing the behavioral relevance, we show that individuals who benefit more from lip movement information in terms of neural speech tracking, show a stronger drop in performance and an increase in perceived difficulty when the mouth is occluded by a surgical face mask. By contrast, no effect was found when the mouth was not occluded. We provide novel insights on how the benefit of lip movements in terms of neural speech tracking varies among individuals. Furthermore, we reveal its behavioral relevance by demonstrating negative consequences for behavior when visual speech is absent. Our results also offer potential implications for future objective assessments of audiovisual speech perception.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Lip movements and lexical features improve speech tracking differently for clear and multi-speaker speech
Chandra Leon Haider, Hyojin Park, … Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·May 15, 2023
- Eye Movements in Silent Visual Speech track Unheard Acoustic Signals and Relate to Hearing Experience
Kaja Rosa Benz, Anne Hauswald, … Nathan Weisz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2025
- Decreasing hearing ability does not lead to improved visual speech extraction as revealed in a neural speech tracking paradigm
Chandra Leon Haider, Anne Hauswald, Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2024
- The impact of face masks on face-to-face neural tracking of speech: auditory and visual obstacles
Marta Fantoni, Alessandra Federici, … Davide Bottari·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2024
- Occlusion of lip movements impairs reconstruction of acoustic speech features and higher-level segmentational features in the presence of a distractor speaker
Chandra Leon Haider, Nina Suess, … Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2021
- Face Viewing Behavior Predicts Multisensory Gain During Speech Perception
Johannes Rennig, Kira Wegner‐Clemens, Michael S. Beauchamp·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2019