GeneticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression
Laura L. ColbraniD, Fabián Ramos-AlmodóvariD, Iain MathiesoniD
Abstract
Most variants identified in human genome-wide association studies and scans for selection are non-coding. Interpretation of these variants effects and understanding of the way in which they contribute to phenotypic variation and adaptation in human populations is therefore limited by our understanding of gene regulation and by the difficulty in confidently linking non-coding variants to genes. To overcome this, we developed a gene-by-gene test for population-specific selection based on combinations of regulatory variants. We extended the QX test for polygenic selection to test for selection on regulatory variants for 17,388 protein-coding genes across 2,504 individuals. We identified 45 genes with significant evidence (FDR <0.1) for selection, including FADS1, KHK, SULT1A2, ITGAM, and genes in the HLA region. We further confirm that significant selection signals do correspond to plausible population-level differences in predicted expression. However, we find that very few (0.2%) genes have strong evidence for directional, population-specific selection on the component of their expression that is predicted by cis-regulatory variants. While this is consistent with most cis-regulatory variation evolving under genetic drift or stabilizing selection, it is also possible that any effects are smaller than we can detect, or that population-specific selection is driven by tissue-specific or trans effects. Our gene-level QX score is independent of other methods for detecting selection based on genomic variation, may therefore be useful when used in combination with more traditional selection tests to specifically identify selection on regulatory variation. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of one approach to combining population-level information with functional data to understand the evolution of gene expression.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measurement of selective constraint on human gene expression
Emily C. Glassberg, Ziyue Gao, … Jonathan K. Pritchard·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2018
- Sex-biased gene regulation varies across human populations as a result of adaptive evolution
Adam Z. Reynolds, Sara D Niedbalski·American Journal of Biological AnthropologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2023
- Predicting functional consequences of recent natural selection in Britain
L. Poyraz, L. L. Colbran, I. Mathieson·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2023
- Does Sex-Differential Gene Expression Drive Sex-Differential Selection in Humans?
Matthew J. Ming, Changde Cheng, … Arbel Harpak·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2025
- The evolutionary forces shaping cis and trans regulation of gene expression within a population of outcrossing plants.
E. B. Josephs, Y. W. Lee, … J. Stinchcombe·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2020
- Strength of purifying selection on the amino-acid sequence is associated with the amount of non-additive variance in gene expression.
Margarita Takou, Daniel J. Balick, … Juliette de Meaux·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2022