bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
eCV: Enhanced coefficient of variation and IDR extensions for reproducibility assessment of high-throughput experiments with multiple replicates.
Agustín González-ReymúndeziD, Kylie A. SheniD, Wayne Doyle, Sichong PengiD, Kasey R. HuttiD, Stephanie Bruns
Abstract
MotivationReproducibility assessment is essential in extracting reliable scientific insights from highthroughput experiments. Inconsistency between technical replicates poses a challenge, particularly clear in next generation sequencing technologies based on immunoprecipitations, where the assessment of reproducibility in peak identification is a critical analytical step. While the Irreproducibility Discovery Rate (IDR) method has been instrumental in assessing reproducibility, its standard implementation is constrained to handling only two replicates. In the current era of steadily growing sample sizes, eased by multiplexing and reduced sequencing costs, highly performing methods that handle any number of replicates are desirable. ResultsWe introduce three novel methods for reproducibility assessment in high-throughput data that handle an arbitrary number of replicates. The first, general IDR (gIDR), extends the standard IDR by adapting its Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to handle distributions of any dimensions dictated by the number of replicates. The second, meta-IDR (mIDR), employs a meta-analysis approach, calculating local IDR scores for all pairs of replicates and combining them using standard probability rules. The third method introduces an "enhanced" Coefficient of Variation (eCV), ranking features based on intensity and variability, using a parametric bootstrap approach to obtain an index analogous to local IDR. Comparative analysis with traditional IDR in simulated and experimental data reveals the heightened performance of the proposed multivariate alternatives under varying scenarios, thereby addressing the critical challenge of reproducibility assessment in contemporary high-throughput experiments. Availability and implementationThe described methods are implemented as an R package: https://github.com/eclipsebio/eCV Contactinfo@eclipsebio.com
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A statistical framework for measuring reproducibility and replicability of high-throughput experiments from multiple sources
Monia Ranalli, Yafei Lyu, … Qunhua Li·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026
- Assessing Reproducibility of High-throughput Experiments in the Case of Missing Data.
Roopali Singh, Feipeng Zhang, Qunhua Li·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2022
- Probability-based methods for outlier detection in replicated high-throughput biological data
Matthew S. Smith, Karthik Devarajan·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2020
- A workflow reproducibility scale for automatic validation of biological interpretation results.
Hirotaka Suetake, Tsukasa Fukusato, … Tazro Ohta·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 28, 2022
- Feature selection by replicate reproducibility and non-redundancy
Tümay Capraz, Wolfgang K. Huber·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- Measuring the reproducibility and quality of Hi-C data
Galip Gürkan Yardımcı, Hakan Özadam, … William Stafford Noble·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2019