medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Scalable automated reanalysis of genomic data in research and clinical rare disease cohorts
Matthew J. WellandiD, K. D. AhlquistiD, Paul De Fazio, Christina Anne Austin-TseiD, Lynn S. PaisiD, Laura Wedd, Samantha J. BryeniD, Rocío RiusiD, Michael FrankliniD, Caitlin Morrison, Giles HalliD, Laura Doyle Gauthier, Alex Bloemendal, David I. FrancisiD, Andrew John MallettiD, Amali C. MallawaarachchiiD, Paul J. LockhartiD, Richard Jacob LeventeriD, Ingrid Eileen SchefferiD, Katherine B. HowelliD, Karin S. KassahniD, Hamish S. ScottiD, Julie M. McGaughraniD, John ChristodoulouiD, David Ross ThorburniD, , Zornitza StarkiD
Abstract
Reanalysis of genomic data in rare disease is highly effective in increasing diagnostic yields but remains limited by manual approaches. Automation and optimization for high specificity will be necessary to ensure scalability, adoption and sustainability of iterative reanalysis. We developed a publicly available automated tool, Talos, and validated its performance using data from 1,089 individuals with rare genetic disease. Trio-based analysis identified 86% of known in-scope diagnoses, returning one variant per case on average. Variant burden reduced to one variant per 200 cases on iterative monthly reanalysis cycles. Application to an unselected cohort of 4,735 undiagnosed individuals identified 248 diagnoses (5.2% yield): 73 (29%) due to new gene-disease relationships, 56 (23%) due to new variant-level evidence, and 119 (48%) due to improved filtering and analysis strategies. Our automated, iterative reanalysis model, applied to thousands of rare disease patients, demonstrates the feasibility of delivering frequent, systematic reanalysis at scale.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 11
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AUTOMATED VERSUS MANUAL REANALYSIS IN RARE DISEASE GENOMICS
Daniel Kaschta, Vincent Arriens, … Malte Spielmann·medRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Automated application of novel gene-disease associations to scale reanalysis of undiagnosed patients
Nana Mensah, Ataf Hussain Sabir, … Joo Wook Ahn·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2021
- AMELIE 3: Fully Automated Mendelian Patient Reanalysis at Under 1 Alert per Patient per Year
Johannes A. Birgmeier, Ethan Steinberg, … Gill Bejerano·medRxiv·Dec 29, 2020
- Joint, multifaceted genomic analysis enables diagnosis of diverse, ultra-rare monogenic presentations
Shilpa N. Kobren, Mikhail A. Moldovan, … Esteban C. Dell’Angelica·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2025
- Dissecting the functional landscape of rare diseases through genomic variation in a heterogeneous cohort of 11,000 patients
Graciela Uría-Regojo, Lidia Fernández‐Caballero, … Pablo Mínguez·medRxiv·Jul 14, 2026
- Re-evaluation and Re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 20%
Tobias Bartolomaeus, Julia Hentschel, … Bernt Popp·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2023