Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsBiochemistryPeer-reviewed journal article
Modeling Alternative Conformational States in CASP16
Namita DubeiD, Theresa A. RamelotiD, Tiburon L. BenavidesiD, Yuanpeng Janet HuangiD, John MoultiD, Andriy KryshtafovychiD, Gaetano Thomas MontelioneiD
Abstract
The CASP16 Ensemble Prediction experiment assessed advances in methods for modeling proteins, nucleic acids, and their complexes in multiple conformational states. Targets included systems with experimental structures determined in two or three states, evaluated by direct comparison to experimental coordinates, as well as domain-linker-domain (D-L-D) targets assessed against statistical models from NMR and SAXS data. This paper focuses on the former class of multi-state targets. Ten ensembles were released as community challenges, including ligand-induced conformational changes, protein-DNA complexes, a trimeric protein, a stem-loop RNA, and multiple oligomeric states of a single RNA. For five targets, some groups produced reasonably accurate models of both reference states (best TM-score >0.75). However, with the exception of one protein-ligand complex (T1214), where an apo structure was available as a template, predictors generally failed to capture key structural details distinguishing the states. Overall, accuracy was significantly lower than for single-state targets in other CASP experiments. The most successful approaches generated multiple AlphaFold2 models using enhanced multiple sequence alignments and sampling protocols, followed by model quality based selection. While the AlphaFold3 server performed well on several targets, individual groups outperformed it in specific cases. By contrast, predictions for one protein-DNA complex, three RNA targets, and multiple oligomeric RNA states consistently fell short (TM-score <0.75). These results highlight both progress and persistent challenges in multi-state prediction. Despite recent advances, accurate modeling of conformational ensembles, particularly RNA and large multimeric assemblies, remains a critical frontier for structural biology.
- assay: protein structure
- assay: protein sequence
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: transformer / foundation model
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of Protein Complex Predictions in CASP16: Are we making progress?
Jing Zhang, Rongqing Yuan, … Qian Cong·Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- CASP16 protein monomer structure prediction assessment
Rongqing Yuan, Jing Zhang, … Nick V. Grishin·Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2025
- Boosting AlphaFold Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction through MSA Engineering and Extensive Model Sampling and Ranking in CASP16
Jian Liu, Pawan Neupane, Jianlin Jack Cheng·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2025
- Improving AlphaFold2 and 3-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM4 in CASP16
Jian Liu, Pawan Neupane, Jianlin Jack Cheng·Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2025
- AlphaFold3 at CASP16
Arne Elofsson·Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2025
- Improving AlphaFold2-based Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15
Jian Liu, Zhiye Guo, … Jianlin Jack Cheng·Communications ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2023