bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Assessing the impact of artificial night lighting regulations designed to protect astronomical observatories on seabirds and bats
Cristina Hernandez de TenaiD, Beneharo RodrígueziD, David Garcia, Juan Federico de la PaziD, Airam RodrígueziD
Abstract
Artificial light at night is a rapidly increasing driver of global change, affecting both astronomical observations and biodiversity. Regulations such as the Canary Islands "Sky Law" were designed to protect astronomical observations by controlling light intensity and spectral composition, yet their ecological effectiveness remains largely untested. Here, we experimentally assessed whether lighting conditions permitted under this law influence the behaviour of two sensitive nocturnal taxa: seabirds and bats. Field experiments were conducted in Tenerife, Canary Islands, using controlled lighting treatments that varied in intensity (low vs. high) and spectrum (PC amber ~1800K vs. white ~2700K), including a no-light control. We monitored the behaviour of breeding adult Corys shearwaters (Calonectris borealis) using GPS tracking and passive acoustic recording, and quantified bat activity through ultrasonic detectors. Behavioural responses included flight characteristics, colony attendance, vocal activity in shearwaters, and species-specific movement and feeding activity in bats. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate treatment effects while accounting for environmental covariates. Across 211 shearwater flights and extensive acoustic datasets, we found no consistent or significant effects of light treatments on seabird flight behaviour, vocal activity, or bat movement and feeding activity. Instead, environmental variables such as moonlight, seasonality, and interannual variation were stronger predictors of behavioural responses. These results suggest that lighting conditions currently permitted under the Sky Law may have limited ecological impact on the studied taxa under the conditions tested. Further research in less disturbed environments and with broader spectral contrasts is needed to better assess the ecological implications of astronomically motivated lighting regulations.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Do seabirds dream of artificial lights? Understanding light preferences of Procellariiformes
E. Atchoi, M. Mitkus, … A. Rodriguez·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2024
- Under Cover of Darkness: Refuge from Artificial Light at Night may Mitigate Risks to Stranded Seabirds
Taylor M. Brown, Kaitlyn Baker, … Gary Burness·Ornithological ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2025
- Short-term effects of experimental artificial light at night on nocturnal vocal activity in a temperate bird community
Kinga Buda, Jakub Buda, Michał Budka·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026
- Far-reaching displacement effects of artificial light at night in a North American bat community
C. Seewagen, J. Nadeau-Gneckow, A. Adams·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2023
- Effect of artificial light at night on sleep and metabolism in weaver birds
- Awake and hungry: artificial light at night disrupts behaviour and reproductive ecology in a wild migratory bird
Juliette Champenois, Sayuri Diaz-Palma, … Joanna Sudyka·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026