Honey contamination from plant protection products approved for cocoa cultivation: a systematic review of existing research and methods
Abstract
Cocoa (Theobroma cocoa), which is the key ingredient of chocolate, is an important economic crop plant which supports the livelihoods of an estimated forty to fifty million people directly involved in its cultivation. Many cocoa producing countries, especially those from the developing world, rely on the income from cocoa export to support their economies. The plant is, however, prone to disease and pest attacks and therefore requires the application of large volumes of pesticides to guarantee satisfactory productions. Even though pesticides help protect the cocoa plant from disease and pest attacks, unintended effects of environmental contamination are also a possibility. Honey, a product of nectar collected by honeybees from flowers during foraging, may be a useful proxy for the extent to which landscapes are exposed to pesticides and the degree of pesticide accumulation in the environment. The overreaching question is: to what extent has the effect of pesticides imputed for cocoa production on honey received attention in research? In this present study, we conducted a systematic approach to quantify existing studies on honey contamination from plant protection products approved for cocoa cultivation. We observed that one hundred and sixty-nine different compounds, comprising some recommended and other unapproved compounds for cocoa cultivation, were detected in 81% of the reviewed 104 publications. Our results further point to the neonicotinoids as the most detected class of pesticides, with imidacloprid particularly being the single most detected compound. However, the most remarkable observation made from this study points to disproportionate studies of honey contamination from pesticides conducted in cocoa and non-cocoa producing countries with only 19% of the publications taking place in the latter. To bridge the gap, we suggest prioritising increased research in cocoa growing countries to ameliorate the significant gaps in knowledge owing to limited studies emanating from these geographic regions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Environmental Risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post-2013
T. J. Wood, D. Goulson·Environmental Science and Pollution ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2017
- Assessment and Monitoring of Certain Pollutants in Natural Honeys Imported from Different Countries and Marketing in Saudi Arabia
K. A. Osman, H. H. E. Mohamed, M. S. Salama·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2023
- Moving Past Neonicotinoids and Honeybees: A Systematic Review of Existing Research on Other Insecticides and Bees
T. Dirilgen, L. Herbertsson, … D. A. Stanley·bioRxiv·May 2, 2023
- Assessment of risk to hoary squash bees (Peponapis pruinosa) and other ground-nesting bees from systemic insecticides in agricultural soil
D. S. Willis Chan, R. S. Prosser, … N. E. Raine·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2019
- Complex landscapes partially mitigate negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
D. Obregon, O. R. Guerrero, … K. Poveda·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2021
- Sublethal concentrations of clothianidin affect honey bee colony behavior and interact with landscapes to affect colony growth
W. G. Meikle, J. J. Adamczyk, … E. Beren·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2020