Brain ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The Effects of Unilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Unimanual Laparoscopic Peg-Transfer Task
Zaeem HadiiD, Aysha Umbreen, Muhammad Nabeel AnwariD, Muhammad Samran NavidiD
Abstract
IntroductionEfficient training methods are required for laparoscopic surgical skills training to reduce the time needed for proficiency. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely used to enhance motor skill acquisition and can be used to supplement the training of laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) on the performance of a unimanual variant of the laparoscopic peg-transfer task. MethodsFifteen healthy subjects participated in this randomized, double-blinded crossover study involving an anodal tDCS and a sham tDCS intervention separated by 48 hours. On each intervention day, subjects performed a unimanual variant of laparoscopic peg-transfer task in three sessions (baseline, tDCS, post-tDCS). The tDCS session consisted of 10 minutes of offline tDCS followed by 10 minutes of online tDCS. The scores based on the task completion time and the number of errors in each session were used as a primary outcome measure. A linear mixed-effects model was used for the analysis. ResultsWe found that the scores increased over sessions (p<0.001). However, we found no effects of stimulation (anodal tDCS vs. sham tDCS) and no interaction of stimulation and sessions. ConclusionThis study suggests that irrespective of the type of current stimulation (anodal and sham) over M1, there was an improvement in the performance of the unimanual peg-transfer task, implying that there was motor learning over time. The results would be useful in designing efficient training paradigms and further investigating the effects of tDCS on laparoscopic peg-transfer tasks.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.20
- Field percentile
- 46th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcranial direct current stimulation does not improve performance in a whole-body movement task
Harriet Caesley, Isabella J. Sewell, … Amir‐Homayoun Javadi·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2021
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation enhances long-term retention after 5 days of lower-limb motor skill learning
August Lomholt Nielsen, Lasse Jespersen, … Jesper Lundbye‐Jensen·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2026
- Neural mechanism underlying task-specific enhancement of motor learning by concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation
Ying Wang, Jixian Wang, … Yunqing Wen·Neuroscience BulletinPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2022
- Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at M1 Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
Hakjoo Kim, Bradley R. King, … David L. Wright·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper
Ethan R Buch, Emiliano Santarnecchi, … Leonardo G Cohen·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2016
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill
Anthony W. Meek, Davin Greenwell, … Zachary A. Riley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024