Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at M1 Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
Hakjoo KimiD, Bradley R. KingiD, Willem B. VerweyiD, John J. BuchananiD, David L. WrightiD
Abstract
Administering anodal tDCS at the primary motor cortex (M1) at various temporal loci relative to motor training is reported to affect subsequent performance gains. Stimulation administered in conjunction with motor training appears to offer the most robust benefit that emerges during offline epochs. This conclusion is made, however, based on between-experiment comparisons that involved varied methodologies. The present experiment addressed this shortcoming by administering the same 15-minute dose of anodal tDCS at M1 before, during, or after practice of a serial reaction time task (SRTT). It was anticipated that exogenous stimulation during practice with a novel SRTT would facilitate offline gains. Ninety participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: tDCS before practice, tDCS during practice, tDCS after practice, or no tDCS. Each participant was exposed to 15 minutes of 2 mA of tDCS and motor training of an eight-element SRTT. The anode was placed at right M1 with the cathode at left M1, and the left hand was used to execute the SRTT. Test blocks were administered 1 and 24 hours after practice concluded. The results revealed significant offline gain for all conditions at the 1-hour and 24-hour test blocks. Importantly, exposure to anodal tDCS at M1 at any point before, during, or after motor training failed to change the trajectory of skill development as compared to the no stimulation control condition. These data add to the growing body of evidence questioning the efficacy of exogenous stimulation as an adjunct to motor training for fostering skill learning. HighlightsO_LITime-dependent consolidation of a novel motor skill occurred within 1 hour after the first practice block C_LIO_LIFurther consolidation of this memory still occurred 24 hours after practice C_LIO_LItDCS at M1 before, during, or after the initial bout of practice did not modify online or offline performance gains C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Field percentile
- top 43%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill
Anthony W. Meek, Davin Greenwell, … Zachary A. Riley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation enhances long-term retention after 5 days of lower-limb motor skill learning
August Lomholt Nielsen, Lasse Jespersen, … Jesper Lundbye‐Jensen·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2026
- Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4mA transcranial electric stimulation
Gavin Hsu, Ahmed Duke Shereen, … Lucas C. Parra·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2022
- Neural mechanism underlying task-specific enhancement of motor learning by concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation
Ying Wang, Jixian Wang, … Yunqing Wen·Neuroscience BulletinPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2022
- No effect of anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation during motor sequence learning in older people
Silke Kerstens, Sanne Broeder, … Jean‐Jacques Orban de Xivry·GeroSciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2026
- Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper
Ethan R Buch, Emiliano Santarnecchi, … Leonardo G Cohen·Clinical NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2017