henhaobio
Sign in

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Interpersonal early adversity demonstrates dissimilarity from early socioeconomic disadvantage in the course of human brain development: A meta-analysis

Anna VannucciiD, Andrea FieldsiD, Eleanor HanseniD, Ariel Katz, John Kerwin, Ayumi Tachida, Nathan Martin, Nim TottenhamiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

It has been established that early-life adversity impacts brain development, but the role of development itself has largely been ignored. We take a developmentally-sensitive approach to examine the neurodevelopmental sequelae of early adversity in a preregistered meta-analysis of 27,234 youth (birth to 18-years-old), providing the largest group of adversity-exposed youth to date. Findings demonstrate that early-life adversity does not have an ontogenetically uniform impact on brain volumes, but instead exhibits age-, experience-, and region-specific associations. Relative to non-exposed comparisons, interpersonal early adversity (e.g., family-based maltreatment) was associated with initially larger volumes in frontolimbic regions until ~10-years-old, after which these exposures were linked to increasingly smaller volumes. By contrast, socioeconomic disadvantage (e.g., poverty) was associated with smaller volumes in temporal-limbic regions in childhood, which were attenuated at older ages. These findings advance ongoing debates regarding why, when, and how early-life adversity shapes later neural outcomes.

Citations
43
FWCI
2.18
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBeck '24Antonacci '26Brosch '25Michel '26Kardan '26Mehta '17
83% semantic matchNeuroscience
Dani Beck, Lucy B. Whitmore, Niamh MacSweeney+6 more·Biological Psychiatry·Jul 29, 2024· 53 citations