Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Distentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence
Sarah L. MasteriD, Maria Katharina EcksteiniD, Neta GotliebiD, Ronald E. DahliD, Linda WilbrechtiD, Anne Gabrielle Eva CollinsiD
Abstract
Multiple neurocognitive systems contribute simultaneously to learning. For example, dopamine and basal ganglia (BG) systems are thought to support reinforcement learning (RL) by incrementally updating the value of choices, while the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes different computations, such as actively maintaining precise information in working memory (WM). It is commonly thought that WM and PFC show more protracted development than RL and BG systems, yet their contributions are rarely assessed in tandem. Here, we used a simple learning task to test how RL and WM contribute to changes in learning across adolescence. We tested 187 subjects ages 8 to 17 and 53 adults (25-30). Participants learned stimulus-action associations from feedback; the learning load was varied to be within or exceed WM capacity. Participants age 8-12 learned slower than participants age 13-17, and were more sensitive to load. We used computational modeling to estimate subjects use of WM and RL processes. Surprisingly, we found more robust changes in RL than WM during development. RL learning rate increased significantly with age across adolescence and WM parameters showed more subtle changes, many of them early in adolescence. These results underscore the importance of changes in RL processes for the developmental science of learning.\n\nHighlights- Subjects combine reinforcement learning (RL) and working memory (WM) to learn\n- Computational modeling shows RL learning rates grew with age during adolescence\n- When load was beyond WM capacity, weaker RL compensated less in younger adolescents\n- WM parameters showed subtler and more puberty-related changes\n- WM reliance, maintenance, and capacity had separable developmental trajectories\n- Underscores importance of RL processes in developmental changes in learning
- Citations
- 98
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable
Ruth Pauli, Inti Angelo Brazil, … Patricia L. Lockwood·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2023
- Modeling Changes in Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence
Liyu Xia, Sarah L. Master, … Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Twice as nice: Boosts in adolescent reinforcement learning from Pavlovian bias and age-related prioritization of reward-motivated incidental memory.
Haley Hegefeld, Juliet Y. Davidow·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2025
- Dissociable mechanisms of reward learning co-mature during human adolescence as predicted by macaque lesion models
Marco K. Wittmann, Maximilian Scheuplein, … MaryAnn P. Noonan·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2021
- Increased ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity in adolescence benefits prosocial reinforcement learning
Bianca Westhoff, Neeltje E. Blankenstein, … Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2021
- Electrical brain activations in preadolescents during a probabilistic reward-learning task reflect cognitive processes and behavioral strategy.
Yu Sun Chung, Berry van den Berg, … Michael Santo Gaffrey·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2023