Persistent genomic erosion in whooping cranes despite demographic recovery
Claudia FontsereiD, Samuel A. SpeakiD, Andrew J. CaveniD, Juan Antonio RodrígueziD, Xuejing WangiD, Carolina PachecoiD, Molly Cassatt‐JohnstoneiD, Georgette FemerlingiD, Brigid MaloneyiD, Jennifer BalaccoiD, Joanna CollinsiD, Ying SimsiD, Linelle Ann L. AbuegiD, Olivier D. FedrigoiD, Erich David JarvisiD, Barry K. HartupiD, Beth ShapiroiD, Marcus Thomas P. GilbertiD, Cock van OosterhoutiD, Hernán E. MoralesiD
Abstract
Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating into a collapse to 16 individuals in 1941. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the population to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality genome reference, and re-sequencing 16 historical and 37 modern genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive-bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its genetic diversity and has increased their inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realized load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and background inbreeding argues against the species downlisting from their current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild-captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realized load. Our findings emphasize the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Species-specific loss of genetic diversity and inbreeding following agricultural intensification
Zachary J. Nolen, Patrycja Jamelska, … Anna Runemark·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2026
- Genomic signatures and demographic history of the widespread and critically endangered yellow-breasted bunting
Guoling Chen, Simon Yung Wa Sin·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2025
- Conservation rescued the Mauritius kestrel from extinction but not from genomic erosion
Xuejing Wang, Anna Stuart, … Hernán E. Morales·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2026
- The last days of Aporia crataegi (L.) in Britain: evaluating genomic erosion in an extirpated butterfly
R. Whitla, K. Hens, … S. Arif·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Genetic load and adaptive potential of a recovered avian species that narrowly avoided extinction
G. Femerling, C. Van Oosterhout, … H. E. Morales·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- Historical population declines prompted significant genomic erosion in the northern and southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum)
F. Sanchez Barreiro, S. Gopalakrishnan, … M. T. P. Gilbert·bioRxiv·May 10, 2020