henhaobio
Sign in

PsychopharmacologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Triggered Temptations: A New Procedure to Compare Reward-Seeking Behaviour Induced by Discriminative and Conditioned Stimuli in Rats

Mandy Rita LeCocqiD, Shaghayegh NajafipashakiiD, Domiziana Casale, Isabel LaplanteiD, Anne‐Noël SamahaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

RationaleEnvironmental cues guide animals towards resources vital for survival but can also drive maladaptive reward-seeking behaviours, as in gambling and eating disorders. While conditioned stimuli (CSs) are paired with reward delivery after reward-seeking actions, discriminative stimuli (DSs) signal reward availability independent of behaviour. ObjectiveWe introduce a procedure to compare CS and DS effects on reward-seeking behaviour, in the same subjects within a single session. MethodsFemale and male Sprague-Dawley rats learned to self-administer sucrose. During each session, DS+ trials signaled that lever pressing would produce sucrose paired with a CS+, and DS-trials signaled no sucrose and a CS-. Next, in the absence of sucrose, we assessed the ability of the cues to i) reinforce lever pressing and ii) increase sucrose seeking when presented response-independently. We also assessed the effects of the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 and d-amphetamine on cue-induced sucrose seeking. ResultsBy the end of self-administration training, lever pressing peaked during DS+ trials and dropped during DS-trials. The DS+ was a conditioned reinforcer of sucrose seeking in both sexes, whereas the CS+ was more effective in males. Response-independent presentations of the DS+ invigorated sucrose seeking in both sexes, whereas the CS+ was effective only in males. LY379268 suppressed DS+-triggered sucrose seeking in females, with no effect in males. D-amphetamine enhanced sucrose seeking non-specifically across cue conditions in males, with no effect in females. ConclusionsOur new trial-based procedure can be used to identify unique and similar mechanisms underlying DS and CS influences on appetitive behaviour.

Citations
4
FWCI
1.56
Field percentile
top 19%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLeCocq '24Ndiaye '24Garceau '21Fraser '18LeCocq '25Halbout '19
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
Mandy Rita LeCocq, Amélie Mainville-Berthiaume, Isabel Laplante+1 more·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2024· 3 citations