Assessing distinct patterns of cognitive aging using tissue-specific brain age prediction based on diffusion tensor imaging and brain morphometry
Geneviève RichardiD, Knut K. KolskåriD, Anne‐Marthe SandersiD, Tobias KaufmanniD, Anders PeterseniD, Nhat Trung DoaniD, Jennifer Monereo SáncheziD, Dag AlnæsiD, Kristine M. UlrichseniD, Erlend S. DørumiD, Ole A. AndreasseniD, Jan Egil NordvikiD, Lars Tjelta WestlyeiD
Abstract
Multimodal imaging enables sensitive measures of the architecture and integrity of the human brain, but the high-dimensional nature of advanced brain imaging features poses inherent challenges for the analyses and interpretations. Multivariate age prediction reduces the dimensionality to one biologically informative summary measure with potential for assessing deviations from normal lifespan trajectories. A number of studies documented remarkably accurate age prediction, but the differential age trajectories and the cognitive sensitivity of distinct brain tissue classes have to a lesser extent been characterized.\n\nExploring differential brain age models driven by tissue-specific classifiers provides a hitherto unexplored opportunity to disentangle independent sources of heterogeneity in brain biology. We trained machine-learning models to estimate brain age using various combinations of FreeSurfer based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging based indices of white matter microstructure in 612 healthy controls aged 18-87 years. To compare the tissue- specific brain ages and their cognitive sensitivity we applied each of the 11 models in an independent and cognitively well-characterized sample (n=265, 20-88 years). Correlations between true and estimated age in our test sample were highest for the most comprehensive brain morphometry (r=0.83, CI:0.78-0.86) and white matter microstructure (r=0.79, CI:0.74-0.83) models, confirming sensitivity and generalizability. The deviance from the chronological age were sensitive to performance on several cognitive tests for various models, including spatial Stroop and symbol coding, indicating poorer performance in individuals with an over-estimated age. Tissue-specific brain age models provide sensitive measures of brain integrity, with implications for the study of a range of brain disorders.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 97
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- White matter microstructure across the adult lifespan: A mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study using advanced diffusion models and brain-age prediction
Dani Beck, Ann‐Marie G. de Lange, … Lars Tjelta Westlye·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2020
- Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: A multi-site replication analysis
Rory Thomas Boyle, Lee Jollans, … Robert Whelan·Brain Imaging and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2020
- BundleAGE: Predicting White Matter Age using Along-Tract Microstructural Profiles from Diffusion MRI
Yixue Feng, Julio E. Villalón‐Reina, … Paul M. Thompson·International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM)Peer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2024
- Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment
Franziskus Liem, Gael P. Varoquaux, … Daniel S. Margulies·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2016
- T1 white/gray contrast as a predictor of chronological age, and an index of cognitive performance
John D. Lewis, Alan Charles Evans, Jussi Tohka·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2018
- Multimodal brain-age prediction and cardiovascular risk: The Whitehall II MRI sub-study
Ann‐Marie G. de Lange, Melis Anatürk, … Klaus P. Ebmeier·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 21, 2020