Biological ConservationEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Guidelines for evaluating the success of large carnivore reintroductions
Willem D. Briers‐LouwiD, Peter Andrew LindseyiD, Angela GaylardiD, Bogdan CristescuiD, Stijn VerschuereniD, Cole du Plessis, Marine DrouillyiD, Drew Arthur BantliniD, Tamar A. KendoniD, Emma E.M. EversiD, Caitlin J. CurryiD, João Almeida, David GaynoriD, Alison Jane LeslieiD, Vincent N. NaudeiD
Abstract
Anthropogenic impacts have led to widespread species decline and extirpation, thereby compelling a global movement to protect and regenerate biodiversity through holistic ecosystem restoration including reintroductions. Yet, despite the increasing practice of conservation-driven reintroduction efforts over the past century, peer-reviewed literature and policy providing criteria with which to evaluate reintroduction stages and efficacy remain limited. Without these comprehensive and quantifiable metrics of relative success, such drastic conservation intervention strategies cannot be objectively evaluated nor compared, hindering the advancement of restoration as a discipline. Herein, we systematically reviewed 227 large carnivore reintroductions of 14 terrestrial mammal species across 23 countries since 1930 to contextualize global efforts to date, and from these, have developed a standardized framework to evaluate reintroduction success. We further retrospectively determined the extent to which existing studies met these criteria towards identifying current knowledge gaps and guide future reintroduction efforts. Most large carnivore records were of Felidae (70%) reintroduced into closed systems (69%) across southern Africa (70%). Our proposed framework provides a full suite of stages, indicators, and targets for reintroduction evaluation, which, when retrospectively applied to reviewed studies, indicated that at least one-third lacked sufficient information to effectively evaluate and compare reintroduction outcomes. This comprehensive and prioritized framework provides novel transparency and scalability to large carnivore reintroduction programs, which is increasingly required to secure the sustained support of impacted communities and stakeholder networks. Moreover, the incorporation of this framework into future practice and policy as an applied tool may directly benefit the recovery of at least 30 large carnivore species, while its principles may be applied more broadly across taxonomic groups for faunal rewilding and global ecosystem restoration.
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A report card methodology to showcase progress towards threatened species recovery
- Opportunities for prioritizing and expanding conservation enterprise in India using carnivores as flagships
A. Srivathsa, I. Majgaonkar, … A. Banerjee·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2020
- Dominant carnivore loss benefits native avian and invasive mammalian scavengers
M. W. Fielding, C. X. Cunningham, … B. W. Brook·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2021
- The contribution of the European LIFE program to mitigate damages caused by large carnivores in Europe
T. Oliveira, A. Treves, … M. Krofel·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2021
- Functional Roles of the World's Recovered Predators
Ishana Shukla, Julia D. Monk, Justine A. Smith·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2026
- Systematic mapping shows monitoring, evaluation, and engagement are needed to build an evidence base for rewilding
Nell J. Pates, James M. Bullock, … William D. Pearse·Conservation BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2026