bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
A report card methodology to showcase progress towards threatened species recovery
M. Ward, T. Rout, R. Stewart, H. Possingham, E. McDonald-Madden, T. Clarke, L. Valentine, G. Kindler, E. Macmillan, J. Watson
Abstract
Among the conservation community, it is well known that Earths mass species extinction crisis is getting worse. Yet, an often neglected problem is the need for effectively communicating the species extinction crisis to diverse audiences in ways that catalyse immediate action. Here we generated a streamlined threatened species recovery report card methodology, which combined two input indicators including planning and funding, one output indicator capturing habitat protection, and one outcome indicator which highlights threatened species trajectories, to provide simple scores for all Australian threatened species. We show that just 41 (2.3%) of species achieved an A grade for the input indicator (i.e., recovery plans and federal funding), 240 (13.3%) achieved a C grade, and 1,521 (84.4%) achieved an F. Five hundred and twenty nine (29.3%) species achieved an A for the output indicator (i.e, habitat protection), 130 (7.2%) achieved a B, 158 (8.8%) achieved a C, 189 (10.5%) achieved a D, 212 (11.8%) achieved an E, and 584 (32.4%) achieved a F. While five (0.3%) species achieved an A for the output indicator (i.e., threat status improvement), every other species (99.7%) achieved an F. We provide a method to combine scores to test how individual jurisdictions are tracking and show that Australia is achieving an F for the input and outcome indicators, and a D for the output indicator. While the threatened species recovery report card highlighted a clear failure in many federal environmental legislation responsibilities, it provides a baseline from which different governments can track policy progress and outlines clear direction for immediate improvement including developing adequate recovery plans, funding the actions in the recovery plans, protecting habitat from further destruction, verifying recovery through monitoring and evaluation of species trajectories, and supporting transparency and collaboration on the execution on the plans through an improved data infrastructure. Without an immediate step change in how Australia communicates and faces its species crisis, we will leave a tragic legacy of extinction and fail our obligations to future generations of Australians, and the international community.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- What works to improve species conservation state? An analysis of species whose state has improved and the actions responsible
Ashley T. Simkins, William J. Sutherland, … Silviu O. Petrovan·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2025
- Recovering birds and mammals across Europe continue to be negatively impacted by threats but benefit from conservation measures
C. Gray, L. McRae, … R. Freeman·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2022
- Recovery plans need better science to support decisions that allow species to decline in abundance but be recovered
Y.-W. Li, J. W. Malcom, … M. Neel·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2020
- Guidelines for evaluating the success of large carnivore reintroductions
Willem D. Briers‐Louw, Peter Andrew Lindsey, … Vincent N. Naude·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2025
- Global threat abatement potential for terrestrial vertebrates
Francesca A. Ridley, Leon Bennun, … Louise Mair·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2026
- Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List
S. M. E. Marsh, M. Hoffmann, … M. Bohm·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2020