Pathogenic paralogous variants can be used to apply the ACMG PS1 and PM5 variant interpretation criteria
Tobias Brünger, Alina IvaniukiD, Eduardo Pérez‐PalmaiD, Ludovica MontanucciiD, Stacey R. CoheniD, Lacey A. SmithiD, Shridhar ParthasarathyiD, Ingo HelbigiD, Michael NothnageliD, Patrick MayiD, Dennis LaliD
Abstract
PurposeThe majority of missense variants in clinical genetic tests are classified as variants of uncertain significance. Broadening the evidence of the PS1 and PM5 criteria has the potential to increase conclusive variant interpretation. MethodsWe hypothesized that incorporation of pathogenic missense variants in conserved residues across paralogous genes can increase the number of variants where ACMG PS1/PM5 criteria can be applied. We mapped over 2.5 million pathogenic and general population variants from ClinVar, HGMD, and gnomAD databases onto 9,990 genes and aligned these by gene families. Subsequently, we developed a novel framework to extend PS1/PM5 by incorporating pathogenic paralogous variants annotations (para-PS1/PM5). ResultsWe demonstrate that para-PS1/PM5 criteria increase the number of classifiable amino acids 3.6-fold compared to PS1 and PM5. Across all gene families with at least two disease-associated genes, the calculated likelihood ratios suggest moderate evidence for pathogenicity. Moreover, for 36 genes, the extended para-PS1/PM5 criteria reach strong evidence level. ConclusionWe show that single pathogenic paralogous variants incorporation at paralogous protein positions increases the applicability of the PS1 and PM5 criteria, likely leading to a reduction of variants of uncertain significance across many monogenic disorders. Future iterations of the ACMG guidelines may consider para-PS1 and para-PM5.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria)
Vineel Bhat, Ivan A. Adzhubei, … Christopher A. Cassa·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2022
- Recommendations for Interpreting the Loss of Function PVS1 ACMG/AMP Variant Criteria
Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun, Tina F. Pesaran, … ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group (ClinGen SVI)·Human MutationPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2018
- Mismatch repair gene specifications to the ACMG/AMP classification criteria: Consensus recommendations from the InSiGHT ClinGen Hereditary Colorectal Cancer / Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel
John‐Paul Plazzer, Finlay Macrae, … Andreas Laner·medRxiv·May 13, 2024
- Curated Multiple Sequence Alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) Gene and Accuracy of In Silico Pathogenicity Predictions
Alexander D. Karabachev, Dylan J. Martini, … Marc S. Greenblatt·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2020
- Validation of the ACMG/AMP guidelines-based seven-category variant classification system
Jian‐Min Chen, Emmanuelle Masson, … Claude Férec·medRxiv·Jan 23, 2023
- Evidence-based calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for clinical use of PP3/BP4 criteria
Vikas Rao Pejaver, Alicia B. Byrne, … Scott Topper·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2022