Neural Mechanisms of Intersensory Switching: Evidence for Delayed Sensory Processing and Increased Cognitive Effort
Théo VanneauiD, Michaël QuiquempoixiD, John J. FoxeiD, Sophie MolholmiD
Abstract
Intersensory switching (IS), the ability to shift attention between different sensory systems, is essential for cognitive flexibility, yet leads to slower responses compared to repeating the same sensory modality. The underlying neural mechanisms of IS remain largely unknown. In this study, high-density EEG was used to investigate these mechanisms in healthy adults (n=53) performing a speeded reaction time (RT) task involving visual and auditory stimuli. Trials were categorized as Repeat (same preceding modality) or Switch (different preceding modality). Switch trials showed slower RTs and delayed sensory responses (N1 and P2 components). Furthermore, across both Repeat and Switch trials, RT correlated with the latency of these neural responses. Additionally, lower alpha-band inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) in primary sensory regions was noted for Switch compared to Repeat trials, suggesting reduced efficiency of sensory processing. Greater induced theta activity over fronto-central scalp regions in Switch trials suggested increased cognitive control demands, potentially involving the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These findings reveal that IS is characterized by delayed sensory processing and heightened cognitive load, supporting a model where prior stimulus primes the sensory cortex for faster processing in Repeat trials, while Switch trials demand more cognitive resources for adjustment. The similarity of effects across both auditory and visual sensory modalities suggests that IS effects represent core features of sensory processing, potentially reflecting a fundamental, modality-independent mechanism of attentional switching across sensory domains.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Task switching costs contribute to the apparent speeding of multisensory reaction times
Miriam Albat, Jasmin Hautmann, … Soner Ülkü·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2021
- Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility and Interference Control in a Stroop Task Switching Paradigm
Zeynab Tahamtan, Seyed Ali Osia, Pawel Andrzej Herman·bioRxiv·May 5, 2025
- Simultaneous cortical tracking of competing speech streams during attention switching
Sara Carta, Emina Aličković, … Giovanni M. Di Liberto·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2025
- The interplay between multisensory integration and perceptual decision making
Manuel R. Mercier, Céline Cappe·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 23, 2020
- Patterns of information segregation during working memory and attention revealed by dual-task interference in behavior, pupillometry, and EEG
Justin T. Fleming, J. Michelle Njoroge, … Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2021
- Neural Correlates of Multisensory Reliability and Perceptual Weights Emerge at Early Latencies during Audio-visual Integration
Stephanie C. Boyle, Stephanie J. Kayser, Christoph Kayser·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2017