Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Retrospective behavioral sampling (RBS): a method to effectively track the cognitive fluctuations driven by naturalistic stimulation
Abstract
Everyday experiences are dynamic, driving fluctuations across simultaneous cognitive processes. A key challenge in the study of naturalistic cognition is to disentangle the complexity of these dynamic processes, without altering the natural experience itself. Retrospective behavioral sampling (RBS) is a novel approach to track the cognitive fluctuations throughout the time-course of naturalistic stimulation, across a variety of cognitive dimensions. We tested the effectiveness and reliability of RBS in a web-based experiment, in which 53 participants viewed short movies and listened to a story, followed by retrospective reporting. Participants recalled their experience of 55 discrete events from the stimuli, rating their quality of memory, magnitude of surprise, intensity of negative and positive emotions, perceived importance, reflectivity state, and mental time travel. In addition, a subset of the original cohort re-rated their memory of events in a follow-up questionnaire. Results show highly replicable fluctuation patterns across distinct cognitive dimensions, thereby revealing a stimulus-driven experience that is substantially shared among individuals. Remarkably, memory ratings more than a week after stimulation resulted in an almost identical time-course of memorability as measured immediately following stimulation. In addition, idiosyncratic response patterns were preserved across different stimuli, indicating that RBS characterizes individual differences that are stimulus invariant. The current findings highlight the potential of RBS as a powerful tool for measuring dynamic processes of naturalistic cognition. We discuss the promising approach of matching RBS fluctuations with dynamic processes measured via other testing modalities, such as neuroimaging, to study the neural manifestations of naturalistic cognitive processing.
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Field percentile
- 49th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Flexible decisions arise from resource-rational memory sampling
Jonathan Nicholas, Sixing Chen, Marcelo Gomes Mattar·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2026
- The vulnerability of working memory to distraction is rhythmic
Malte Wöstmann, Troby Ka‐Yan Lui, … Jonas Obleser·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2020
- How goals shape naturalistic memories: bias in gaze and narrative recall
Hannah Habenicht, Mara Mueller, … Nora M. Roüast·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2026
- Spontaneous eye blinks as temporal markers of internal attention
Daniel A. Schneider, Şahcan Özdemir, … Stefan Arnau·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2026
- Environmental rhythms orchestrate neural activity at multiple stages of processing during memory encoding: Evidence from event-related potentials
Paige Connors Hickey, Annie Barnett-Young, … Elizabeth Race·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2020
- Real-time fMRI-triggered experience-sampling: a proof-of-concept study
Tiara Bounyarith, David Braun, Aaron Kucyi·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026