NeuropsychologiaNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The vulnerability of working memory to distraction is rhythmic
Malte WöstmanniD, Troby Ka‐Yan LuiiD, Kai-Hendrik Friese, Jens KreitewolfiD, Malte Naujokat, Jonas ObleseriD
Abstract
Recent research posits that the cognitive system samples target stimuli in a rhythmic fashion, characterized by target detection fluctuating at frequencies of ~3-8 Hz. Besides prioritized encoding of targets, a key cognitive function is the protection of working memory from distractor intrusion. Here, we test to which degree the vulnerability of working memory to distraction is rhythmic. In an Irrelevant-Speech Task, N = 23 human participants had to retain the serial order of nine numbers in working memory while being distracted by task-irrelevant speech with variable temporal onsets. The magnitude of the distractor-evoked N1 component in the event-related potential as well as behavioural recall accuracy, both measures of memory distraction, were periodically modulated by distractor onset time in approximately 2-4 cycles per second (Hz). Critically, an underlying 2.5-Hz rhythm explained variation in both measures of distraction such that stronger phasic distractor encoding mediated lower phasic memory recall accuracy. In a behavioural follow-up experiment, we tested whether these results would replicate in a task design without rhythmic presentation of target items. Participants (N = 6 with on average >2,500 trials, each) retained two line-figures in memory while being distracted by acoustic noise of varying onset across trials. In agreement with the main experiment, the temporal onset of the distractor periodically modulated memory performance. These results suggest that during working memory retention, the human cognitive system implements distractor suppression in a temporally dynamic fashion, reflected in ~400-ms long cycles of high versus low distractibility.
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Irrelevant Predictions: Distractor Rhythmicity Modulates Neural Encoding in Auditory Cortex
Shiri Makov, Elana Zion Golumbic·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020
- Neural bases of space-specific distractor biases in visual working memory
Deepak Velgapuni Raya, Sanchit Gupta, Devarajan Sridharan·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2023
- Rhythmic temporal coordination of neural activity prevents representational conflict during working memory
Miral Abdalaziz, Zach V. Redding, Ian C. Fiebelkorn·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2023
- Attention-related sampling of targets rhythmically alternates with increased susceptibility to co-occurring distractors
Zach V. Redding, Yun Ding, Ian C. Fiebelkorn·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 23, 2026
- Rhythmic Sampling and Competition of Target and Distractor in a Motion Detection Task
Changhao Xiong, Nathan M. Petro, … Mingzhou Ding·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- Working memory availability affects neural indices of distractor processing during visual search
Dion Henare, Jude Buckley, Paul Michael Corballis·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2018